Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 210 Xenar 4.5, cover 8x10 wide open?

  1. #1
    3d Visual Effects artist
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Culver City, CA
    Posts
    1,177

    210 Xenar 4.5, cover 8x10 wide open?

    Would a 210 f4.5 Xenar in Compund shutter cover 8x10 wide open when focusing at head & shoulders range? How about full standing bodylength range? No movements needed.

    Darkening of the corners won't bother me, but I'm wanting to find out if the corners will go completely black/clear?

    I read that it has a 255mm image circle (10 inches), Any ideas on what this would do at portrait range wide open? I've often heard Schneider is conservative when rating their their coverage circle. Anyone have experience with this lens on 8x10?
    Daniel Buck - 3d VFX artist
    3d work: DanielBuck.net
    photography: 404Photography.net - BuckshotsBlog.com

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,794

    Re: 210 Xenar 4.5, cover 8x10 wide open?

    Close focusing the image circle increases. For example at 1:1 the image circle doubles. Somebody I'm sure knows the formula to figure out the image circle at different magnifactions.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    1,195

    Re: 210 Xenar 4.5, cover 8x10 wide open?

    Daniel, at 1:1, the image circle is twice what is at infinity, that is over 500mm. I don't know what would be the IC at portrait distances, but if you don't like a calculator (and like me, don't have the formula), I have another idea for you: you can do it geometrically, draw a graph with magnification on one axis (this would have to have logarithmic scale), and image circle on the second, you may find out the probable IC.

    From my experience with my sample of Xenar 210mm 1:4.5, the corners will go black. I don't know how conservative Schneider is with their IC statement, but I have run out of coverage several times - landscape shot, @ f/11-16, horizontal orientation, 5x8" format, approx 3-5cm rise.
    Jiri Vasina
    www.vasina.net

    @ Google+ | @ Facebook | @ flickr

    My books @ Blurb (only heavily outdated "Serene Landscape").

  4. #4
    3d Visual Effects artist
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Culver City, CA
    Posts
    1,177

    Re: 210 Xenar 4.5, cover 8x10 wide open?

    It looks like it covers 8x10 at full length standing portrait distances, I won't be able to take the lens outside to really give it a try until next weekend probably, but so far it looks like it covers!

    I gave the front standard about 2 inches fall, and it looks like that clipped the top corners. That's just what I see on the glass, I'm sure the corners (with no fall) will be darker than the center, but I don't think they will be clipped black/clear for full length portrait distances. I'm sure it will have no problems at head/shoulder distances based on what I'm seeing, full length standing portraits will probably depend on how much room I want above and below the person (how far back I stand).

    If anyone else is interested in this, let me know and I'll post my findings once I have a chance to shoot with it.
    Daniel Buck - 3d VFX artist
    3d work: DanielBuck.net
    photography: 404Photography.net - BuckshotsBlog.com

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    381

    Re: 210 Xenar 4.5, cover 8x10 wide open?

    Daniel, I'm interested to see what you get with the 210.

  6. #6
    3d Visual Effects artist
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Culver City, CA
    Posts
    1,177

    Re: 210 Xenar 4.5, cover 8x10 wide open?

    Quote Originally Posted by photobulley View Post
    Daniel, I'm interested to see what you get with the 210.
    Me too! I use the 240 g-claron for most of my "wide-angle" 8x10 shooting, but there are times when I wish I could get a bit thinner DOF, I'm hoping that the 210 here provides that, being about 2 stops more open! Same when I use the 240 on 4x5, sometimes I wish it were faster.

    I did notice that the board it came on is labled a "Linhof IV board", it seems to be slightly larger than my linhof/wista boards and doesn't fit my camera. Is there something different about a linhof IV board? Or is the board possibly home made? (looks like it could be, but it's so beat-up it's hard to tell) Nothing some filing can't take care of :-D
    Daniel Buck - 3d VFX artist
    3d work: DanielBuck.net
    photography: 404Photography.net - BuckshotsBlog.com

Similar Threads

  1. Best wide wide for multi formats up to 8X10?
    By audioexcels in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 17-Mar-2008, 12:33
  2. Whole Plate Wide Angle Lens Of Choice in the Schneider XL Lineup
    By audioexcels in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 15-Dec-2007, 22:29
  3. Congo 210 vs Xenar 210
    By Philippe Gauthier in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 28-Apr-2007, 09:30
  4. Shooting LF lense wide open, what happens??
    By Bill Glickman in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 28-Dec-1999, 15:34
  5. Nikkor-AM (macro) 210 for general 8X10 use?
    By Mark Nowaczynski in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30-Nov-1999, 18:23

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •