Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    15

    wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

    Hello all,

    When comparing 2 lenses of varying focal legths that I'm considering purchasing, I've come across a question that I was hoping someone more experienced could help me with. I was considering both the Nikkor SW 75mm with a listed angle of coverage of 106 degrees and a Fujinon SWD 65mm with an angle of coverage listed at 105 degrees.

    My question is: is the 75mm a wider lens than the 65mm? Will I get a wider view with this longer lens? It doesn't seem to make sense to me at all and Im not quite sure how a longer lens can give a wider angle of coverage . . . if anyone can explain this I would really appreciate your help!!

    Best regards!

    Mark

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,955

    Re: wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

    The 65 will give you a wider perspective than the 75, but the 75 will permit a bit more movement than the 65.

    See the rise possible for the 65 and the 75 on this chart:

    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...s/LF4x5in.html

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Gresham OR
    Posts
    1,374

    Re: wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

    The 75mm with 106 degree coverage have an image Circle (IC) of 199mm
    The 65mm with 105 degree coverage will have an image Circle of 169.4mm
    Imagine the circle behind the lens when it is focused on something at infinity. This is what projects the image on your film.
    To cover a 4x5 sheet of film you will need about 154mm IC so the 65mm barely covers.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA, USA
    Posts
    420

    Re: wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

    It sounds like you are coming from the 35mm world. For large format there are a few different aspects you have to pay attention to:

    1.) As in the 35mm world a shorter focal length provides what you refer to as a wider angle.
    2.) Lenses can not illuminate an infinitely large piece of film. The angle of coverage refers to how much film the lens can cover. An angle of coverage is a good way to specify this because as the lens is focused at closer objects the lens moves further from the film and can cover a larger piece of film.
    I3.) f you use camera movements such as shift or tilt, the film probably won't be centered in the area that the lens illuminates. Typically you want lenses which can cover an area significantly larger than the film


    Jeff Keller
    (http://www.julianalee.com - real estate for sale images)

    Quote Originally Posted by markinwaterloo View Post
    Hello all,

    My question is: is the 75mm a wider lens than the 65mm? Will I get a wider view with this longer lens? It doesn't seem to make sense to me at all and Im not quite sure how a longer lens can give a wider angle of coverage . . . if anyone can explain this I would really appreciate your help!!

    Best regards!

    Mark

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    1,195

    Re: wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

    angle of coverage indicates the diameter of image circle illuminated. You can calculate the exact image circle size if you know the angle of coverage and focal length using goniometric functions (tangens and like). I don't know the exact formula, though...

    It has nothing to do with "angle of view", which describes how wide the lens is (like the focal length). Maybe there lies the confusion.
    Jiri Vasina
    www.vasina.net

    @ Google+ | @ Facebook | @ flickr

    My books @ Blurb (only heavily outdated "Serene Landscape").

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    2,474

    Re: wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jiri Vasina View Post
    angle of coverage indicates the diameter of image circle illuminated. You can calculate the exact image circle size if you know the angle of coverage and focal length using goniometric functions (tangens and like). I don't know the exact formula, though...

    It has nothing to do with "angle of view", which describes how wide the lens is (like the focal length). Maybe there lies the confusion.
    Unfortunately Jiri, you couldn't be more wrong on this.
    The angle of coverage does not indicate the diameter of image circle. You can have two lenses, one that has a huge image circle -without being a wide angle lens- and the other that has a much smaller image circle and is a wide angle lens. Compare the huge Schneider 1100mmXXL (not a wide angle at all, despite its enormous 900 mm image circle) and the Schneider Super Angulon XL 72mm with its much smaller image circle - "just" 229 mm which is a wide angle lens. Why? Because the former has a coverage angle just some 44° and the latter whole 115°!
    And you can have a lens with the same angle of coverage and different image circles (because of a different focal length), to make it more "complicated", and lenses with the same image circle and different angle of coverage.
    The angle of coverage is in degrees, the image diameter in mm/in. Think of it...
    The angle of view doesn't describe at all how "wide a lens is", only how wide it sees for the given film format. Think of it...


    Quote Originally Posted by markinwaterloo View Post
    Hello all,

    When comparing 2 lenses of varying focal lengths that I'm considering purchasing, I've come across a question that I was hoping someone more experienced could help me with. I was considering both the Nikkor SW 75mm with a listed angle of coverage of 106 degrees and a Fujinon SWD 65mm with an angle of coverage listed at 105 degrees.

    My question is: is the 75mm a wider lens than the 65mm? Will I get a wider view with this longer lens? It doesn't seem to make sense to me at all and Im not quite sure how a longer lens can give a wider angle of coverage . . . if anyone can explain this I would really appreciate your help!!

    Best regards!

    Mark
    Mark, it's simple. The wider lens of them is the one with a bigger angle of coverage.
    But the angle of view depends on the film format you use. If you use the same film format the longer focal length will see less than the shorter one (for the same taking distance), even if the longer has a wider angle of coverage - you just don't use it fully with the same film format...

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,794

    Re: wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

    Quote Originally Posted by GPS View Post
    Mark, it's simple. The wider lens of them is the one with a bigger angle of coverage.
    Well no. If you take two 150mm lenses with different angles of coverage one isn't wider then the other. Sure a big angle of coverage might let you use it on a bigger format and therefore it can be a wide lens for a bigger format. But angle of coverage indicates coverage. Even the 80degree "normal" lenses can be wide on the next step up in format.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    1,195

    Re: wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

    GPS, I think I'm not that wrong.

    Angle of coverage together with the focal length do describe the image circle (and yes, that is precisely the reason why the 1100XXL with only 44° angle of coverage but with the focal length of 1100mm has such a huge image circle. But relatively to its focal length, it's small). I have stated that in my previous post, although maybe not as clearly. You can calculate any one of the remaining parameters if you know the other two: angle of coverage, focal length, image circle. They are all part of one imaginary optical triangle.
    Jiri Vasina
    www.vasina.net

    @ Google+ | @ Facebook | @ flickr

    My books @ Blurb (only heavily outdated "Serene Landscape").

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    2,474

    Re: wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jiri Vasina View Post
    angle of coverage indicates the diameter of image circle illuminated. You can calculate the exact image circle size if you know the angle of coverage and focal length using goniometric functions (tangens and like). I don't know the exact formula, though...

    It has nothing to do with "angle of view", which describes how wide the lens is (like the focal length). Maybe there lies the confusion.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jiri Vasina View Post
    GPS, I think I'm not that wrong.

    Angle of coverage together with the focal length do describe the image circle
    -snip
    I have stated that in my previous post, although maybe not as clearly. You can calculate any one of the remaining parameters if you know the other two: angle of coverage, focal length, image circle. They are all part of one imaginary optical triangle.
    Sorry Jiri, not to beat the horse ad nauseum, but in your first post, first phrase you mentioned the angle of coverage (without any focal length!) as an indication of the image circle. That is clearly incorrect and that's why I corrected it. Only then, in the second post, did you add the focal length to it... Nobody denied the possibility of calculations, provided you know at least two input values.
    Also, the angle of view doesn't "describe how wide the lens is" , as you say, only how wide the lens sees - two very different things, aren't they... If you put a 6x6 film format on the SA XL 72mm you will have a normal lens, although the lens is a wide angle lens. Put there the 6x17 film format and abracadabra,the lens is a wide angle lens... Thus both statements, written as they are, were misleading. Hence my correction.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,219

    Re: wide angle lens (angle of coverage question)

    Let me split a hair. The image circle is not the same as the circle in which there is adequate illumination. It is the circle in which the definition is considered adequate. That will generally be smaller than the circle where there is enough light to produce an image. In some circumstances, where one doesn't care about sharpness at the edges, you can shift beyond the boundary of the circle of coverage. An example might be where that part of the image consists of open sky or clouds which need not be sharp.

Similar Threads

  1. Wide Angle Lens for Super Speed Graphic
    By sheldon hambrick in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-Jun-2008, 07:23
  2. My stupid lens question.
    By e. a. smith in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 20-Mar-2007, 15:54
  3. Ross Wide Angle XPres coverage?
    By DE Carney in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 7-Nov-2001, 05:35
  4. Schneider 47mmXL coverage test
    By Micah Marty in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 16-Nov-2000, 12:17
  5. Fall off with wide angle lens
    By Jose Stanek in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 4-Apr-1998, 15:21

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •