Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Diafine and TMY-2

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,955

    Re: Diafine and TMY-2

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Cole View Post
    The Expert tank is ridiculously expensive, but it loads faster and easier and provides perfect development. I couldn't ask for more. I am a very happy camper.

    The 2500 series tank will be relegated to 120 roll development.
    The 3010 was the best use of $270 I've ever made!

  2. #12
    wclavey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    166

    Re: Diafine and TMY-2

    OK, a few minor variations on a theme but with excellent results...

    I'm not claiming any credit for this except for the 1 variation I introduced, but I am wildly supporting the concept and the results as people have reported both in this thread and in the Sandy King article thread...

    Over the past 2 days I have processed 3 batches of TMY-2 in Diafine with continuous agitation. I have scanned the negatives from the first 2 batches and I am absolutely pleased beyond belief. I exposed it for ASA 400, metered for the shadows, the highlights and incident and generally exposed based on combining the incident and the shadow (roughly a Zone 3).

    I developed in a Jobo 2523 tank with the 6-sheet reel on a unicolor roller base, which reverses direction about every 15 seconds or so, after about 1.25 rotations of the tank.

    The only change I made to the process Jim Cole described was to use a 4 min pre-soak and then full strength Solution A for 3 min, followed by Solution B 1:1 for 3 min. I used the pre-soak and the full strength Solution A because I found that it contributed to more even development and fewer air bubbles on the 4x5 film, and previously someone had observed that the results of the Solution A 1:1 and the use of a pre-soak followed by full strength Solution A were about the same.

    I also included a few sheets of Arista EDU 100 in the mix in the same batch and the results there were equally great. I feel like the combination of the pre-soak, the Diafine and the continuous agitation from the roller base have eliminated my processing unevenness. And the negatives, even as high contrast as I get shooting down here in the Texas afternoon sun, are great for scanning.

    Thanks to all who have experimented and reported on this.
    Last edited by wclavey; 10-Aug-2008 at 13:58. Reason: bad spelling

  3. #13
    Wayne venchka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,872

    Cool Re: Diafine and TMY-2

    OK, so I'm not going to give you my unopened box of Diafine just yet. Sounds like we need to have a TMY-2 and Modified Diafine vs. Xtol 1:3 Throwdown!
    Wayne
    Deep in the darkest heart of the North Carolina rainforest.

    Wayne's Blog

    FlickrMyBookFaceTwitSpacei

  4. #14
    wclavey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    166

    Re: Diafine and TMY-2

    Quote Originally Posted by venchka View Post
    OK, so I'm not going to give you my unopened box of Diafine just yet. Sounds like we need to have a TMY-2 and Modified Diafine vs. Xtol 1:3 Throwdown!

    Bring it on!

Similar Threads

  1. Diafine and Acros 100 - Two Bath Dev.
    By Jim Cole in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 1-Aug-2008, 15:17
  2. high speed 4X5 film: HP5 in Microphen vs. TXP in Diafine?
    By Henry Carter in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 6-Sep-2004, 07:09
  3. Pyrocat HD with HP4, HP5, TMY 400, Tri-X
    By Ken Lee in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 23-Dec-2003, 14:15

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •