Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

  1. #1
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

    I sat down for coffee with fellow New Mexicans and LF junkies Don Boyd and David Braum today, partly to compare David's 4x5 Chamonix and my 4x5 Phillips camera. This is a comparison I had wanted to do for awhile as many have talked about the Chamonix design being derived from the Phillips and indeed it is. My Phillips is not common however, It was custom ordered and then altered by the original owner, Michael Mutmanski. It has the long flexible "Universal Bellows", a Horseman international back and redesigned rear standard brackets (which make it more compact).

    The basic structure and design of the two cameras is very similar. The Chamonix is a refinement of the basic Phillips design. It is more compact and a bit lighter (Its hard to say how much, we were sitting at a Starbucks, and most Phillips don't have the heavier Horseman back), whereas the larger Phillips extend further for longer lenses. Both cameras are superbly rigid, even fully racked out-the Phillips is the most rigid folding field cameras I have ever used and the lightest. The Chamonix lacks the focus lock of the Phillips. But David said he didn't find an issue with that in practice, but its lack is a slight concern to me. If you were running over rough terrain to change camera position in changing light, would the focus shift? If you were shooting straight down does the focus sink? As designed by Dick, the focus lock extends above the focus screw and pushes the rear standard design up about 3/4 of an inch-part of why the Chamonix is able to be more compact. The Phillips with the universal bellows handles much longer lenses (I've comfortably used from a 450 [focused much closer than infinity] on the Phillips to even wides like a 120 on a flat board with full movements, wider lenses become more restricted as they get wider and need recessed lens boards), but the bellows is not interchangeable. The Chamonix has interchangeable bellows, a plus for sure, though I understand from David that accessories like bag bellows are not available yet? Set up and function is virtually the same.

    You can see my Phillips here with a Nikkor 120SW focused at infinity: http://www.largeformatphotography.in...3&d=1212377729

    All in all the Chamonix very well made and beautiful. I had thought before seing one that they were the Volkswagon of field 4x5s, but they are much more than that. David's was stained black (Walnut?) and in that color very much had the black techy look of the Phillips. Owning the Phillips I feel like I own a first generation original of a fine sports car and when you get down to it they are so similar that I wouldn't feel the need to acquire a Chamonix, but if I didn't have the Phillips and was in the market............if only the Chamonix had the long Universal bellows and a focus lock........
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  2. #2
    3d Visual Effects artist
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Culver City, CA
    Posts
    1,177

    Re: Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Gittings View Post
    if only the Chamonix had a Universal bellows......
    They do Not standard issue, but you can order it. I've just ordered mine, to help out movement with the wide angle a bit more! Don't know if it would do anything better for longer lenses though. I use 90mm on it all the time, I have decent movement, but I'd like a bit more than what the standard bellows can do comfortably.

    I've often wondered about the focus lock as well! However, I've never noticed it slip. If I did more macro work where the camera was angled straight down, it might be more of an issue? I'm not sure.
    Daniel Buck - 3d VFX artist
    3d work: DanielBuck.net
    photography: 404Photography.net - BuckshotsBlog.com

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,498

    Re: Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

    Thanks for the interesting comparison. I think the recent auction prices for Dick Phillip's cameras reflect the superb design and quality of his cameras. But I also believe that the Chamonix is more than a "knock-off" as some have characterized it. I believe the Universal bellows is available for the 45N-1 and I plan on ordering one, but I don't know the specs.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    The Beach, FL
    Posts
    106

    Re: Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

    Hey Kirk,
    According to Hugo there is also a bag bellows available.

    Tony

  5. #5
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Re: Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

    Thanks for the interesting comparison. I think the recent auction prices for Dick Phillip's cameras reflect the superb design and quality of his cameras. But I also believe that the Chamonix is more than a "knock-off" as some have characterized it.
    Barry, Well said. I agree with both observations.
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    743

    Re: Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Gittings View Post
    Owning the Phillips I feel like I own a first generation original of a fine sports car ...
    So the Phillips is like a Porsche 356 and the Chamy is then a 911? Or more like the Phillips is a 911 and the Chamy is a 930?

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    751

    Re: Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

    I am a huge fan of Dick's cameras - I've owned a couple of 11x14s, a couple of 8x10s and a 4x5. Currently, I have a Chamonix 4x5 and an 8x10. I'd agree that the Chamonix has a few small refinements and the Phillips still has a few advantages too. I don't find the focus lock and issue at all - the lead screw on the Chamonix is a little stiffer than on the Phillips probably to account for the lack of an unnecessary lock. Dick changed the design of the lock on the Phillips to a small lever later on - neither deisgn was terribly elegant, but both worked fine. The clip on the older type was prone to breaking after time; and the lever type could be ruined by over tightening too, so neither was perfect. I recently sold my Phillips Compact II and replaced it with a Chamonix 8x10 - functionally, the cameras are almost identical (although I miss the bail back on the Phillips). I sold the Phillips for considerably more than I paid for a like new Chamonix (in fact I bought a like new Fujinon 360 A with the change and was still cash positive) - seemed to be a no brainer to me.

    The single feature I like most on the Chamonix is the lead screw thread - one full revolution equates to 12mm (1/2 inch) of movement of the focus bed - this means that to work out near/far focus distance, you can simply observe the movement on the focus wheel while under the darkcloth (mark it up like a clock with bright white paint) - every 5 minutes on the clock corresponds to 1mm... This is considerably more conveneient than ducking out from under the darkcloth to look at a ruler device round the front of the focussing bed for both near and far extension.


    Personally, I don't think the design is sportscar like at all - both are sort of highly functional truck designs... An F-line or Misura equates better with a sportscar. FWIW, I don't think that there is a better field camera for under $2000 than the 4x5.

  8. #8
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Re: Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

    Personally, I don't think the design is sportscar like at all - both are sort of highly functional truck designs... An F-line or Misura equates better with a sportscar. FWIW, I don't think that there is a better field camera for under $2000 than the 4x5.
    True enough I guess, but when you have only owned Tachiharas, Zone VI's and Calumets, the Phillips seems like the bomb.
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    963

    Re: Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

    Quote Originally Posted by Tony Flora View Post
    Hey Kirk,
    According to Hugo there is also a bag bellows available.

    Tony
    as far as I know the bag bellow is not ready yet, might come out with the July batch. I have a universal bellow works just fine.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    20mins north of boston
    Posts
    499

    Re: Chamonix vs. Phillips 4x5

    Do not all manufactures in one way or another copy their competition's products in some form or another : Did not all The Lens makers do just that , except we will call it this , i.e. Doppel anastigmat, double anastigmats, , list list goes on and on here which is a mout point what needs to looked and and examimed is it the product being made by mfg:[A] equal to or better than mfg[B] ; at the same price or lower:

    In todays market we have very few good camera markers left to choose from or we go
    to the used market , and here again what will give me the most return on my money I about to invest in this camera and system , because the list has just began when You enter the Large format arena to play in :

    As for Universal bellows , which is great for us but not mfg"s , well now their bellows fits mine and theirs fit mine : Well they are looking to make the most greens they can, Otherwise we would have had a Universal for everything made, Boy could we have saved money there:

    So at the Present time who is make-ing the best for the least cost and give-ing us the greatest return for the money:

    With Wooden Field cameras the list is very short when you leave out used cameras

    So Its Chamouix and who ever else there is, the people in hungary and Lotus also Horseman [not sure of this mfg] Shen Hao:

    and yes there metal 4x5 field camera like Toyo-View which is a composit camera
    Lauren MacIntosh

    Whats in back of you is the past and whats in front of you is the future now in the middle you have choices to make for yourself:

Similar Threads

  1. differences betwen 4x5 5x7 and 8x10 when you shoot
    By luis prado in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-Jun-2008, 11:52
  2. Chamonix 4x5 price.
    By Helmetfire in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14-Oct-2007, 10:42
  3. Death Valley trip with Toyo 4X5
    By Scott Squires in forum Location & Travel
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 27-Mar-2006, 00:16
  4. Experiences with the Phillips 4x5
    By David Payumo in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-Dec-2001, 00:47

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •