Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: architecture: slight converging verticals

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 1999
    Posts
    106

    architecture: slight converging verticals

    I have a technique question regarding converging verticals in architecture. I am in the habit of eliminating converging verticals on buildings except when I wis h to emphasize some aspect of the building/composition, in which case I leave st rong converging vertical lines. For this case,I'm mainly referring to rise rathe r than fall. However, I recently showed some poloroids I shot (no converging ver ticals) to a pro here in Japan who told me that usually, a slight hint of conver ging verticals is deliberately left in the shot since it gives the viewer a bett er feeling than a shot devoid of converging verticals. Is this common practice i n the US in architecture photography, or is this just a cultural preference in J apan?

  2. #2

    architecture: slight converging verticals

    Try to find a copy of the Michael Harris book, "Professional Architectural Photography". In the section titled "Problem Exteriors" he talks about the issue of shooting tall buildings with excessive vertical shift, which creates an apparent divergence of verticals giving the building a top heavy feeling. I've seen this in my own shooting. The solution is to balance your vertical rise with some degree of tilting off vertical (giving convergence) in these situations. Other than solving this type of problem, I'm not aware of deliberate convergence of verticals as a common practice.

  3. #3

    architecture: slight converging verticals

    I wouldn't say it's "common practice", necessarialy...more an advanced technique. But the bottom line, of course,,is what looks best..and feels right. The prvious response is entirely correct...but this will also depend very much on the lens used, the point of view of the camera relative to the building and the perspective employed. Another trick is when shooting down (especially) at a steep angle...let the verticals converge to increase the drama of the shot. This may mean employing either no corrections..or very slight corrections..depending

  4. #4

    architecture: slight converging verticals

    I've read in some of the Sinar books that you can "get away with" not fully correcting the verticals of a building in a picture if you'd have to look up or down at more than 20 degrees from the horizontal to see the top or bottom respectively if you were looking in real life. They make out that the brain expects to see some convergence / divergence due to the height etc and to have a fully corrected picture would look false / not true to life.

    As others have said though, it's up to you in the end with what you feel best portrays the building or what your client / end user wants.

Similar Threads

  1. Slight color cast with Forte paper in Dektol
    By brian steinberger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 14-Feb-2006, 06:47
  2. Slight problem processing with Jobo 3005
    By Scott Schroeder in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 20-Sep-2005, 17:11
  3. Shen-hao vs. Toyo- a slight departure
    By John C Murphy in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 26-May-2005, 02:07
  4. 7x17 Verticals
    By Peter Galea in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 18-Feb-2005, 23:53
  5. Problem with slight film rotation
    By Leonard Evens in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 24-Apr-2004, 08:55

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •