Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Negative or positive scanning

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    17

    Negative or positive scanning

    Any views as whether better results are obtained from scanning colour positives (slides) as against colour negative.

  2. #2
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Re: Negative or positive scanning

    Color negatives take more work. An over simplied explanation would be that scanner profile software is designed for chromes. So sometimes it is a little harder to find color balance and to get color fidelity (for instance the color neg profiles in Silverfast render blues with too much magenta-I tweak these profiles to my taste and save them-no big deal). But many people (myself included) prefer the longer scale and lower contrast of color negatives (even for b&w prints sometimes).
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,955

    Re: Negative or positive scanning

    I switched to neg a couple of years ago, after not having used it for many years. The quality of current neg materials is very good.

    I scan on a Epson 4990 using Silverfast, I got perfect color using one of the included profiles.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    5,506

    Re: Negative or positive scanning

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Gittings View Post
    Color negatives take more work. An over simplied explanation would be that scanner profile software is designed for chromes. So sometimes it is a little harder to find color balance and to get color fidelity (for instance the color neg profiles in Silverfast render blues with too much magenta-I tweak these profiles to my taste and save them-no big deal). But many people (myself included) prefer the longer scale and lower contrast of color negatives (even for b&w prints sometimes).
    Color negative film is also usually sharper than transparency film when comparing film of the same ASA, though grain may not be as fine.

    Using color negative film instead of B&W fim opens up a lot of post-scan processing controls if you plan to print in B&W, though for ultimate sharpness and grain the B&W film has a bit of an advantage.

    Sandy King

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    133

    Re: Negative or positive scanning

    Agree with Kirk.

    The traditional view from production photogs that have high volume is that slides are best, because you can get an exact match to a reference image (the slide.)

    For those of us looking for quality - subtle coloration, dynamic range, etc. - negative films can deliver a bit more. But it does take more work.

    Scanner hardware is also less likely to be pushed to the max with negative film than with slide. Hard to dig out all the detail in the shadows on a slide, especially on a flatbed.

Similar Threads

  1. Negative Scanning
    By andrew vincent in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 26-Feb-2008, 12:04
  2. Negative or Chrome 4x5, Which is best for scanning?
    By Rafael Macia in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 22-Dec-2007, 09:08
  3. Improving Scanner DMax - Scan both a negative and Duplicated Positive?
    By Michael Heald in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-Sep-2006, 06:44
  4. Scanning 4 x 5 color negative
    By Wilbur Wong in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 9-Oct-2005, 19:25
  5. Best LF negative film for drum scanning?
    By Bill Glickman in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 8-Nov-2000, 10:36

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •