Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: Tripods: any major difference between

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    134

    Tripods: any major difference between

    CF and wood? I assume wood is a bit heavier? I like the specs I see on the Feisol products. The Ries look nice and fold small....but they're twice the weight snd price. What's the Anti-Rotation business all about? Any recommendations on Heads? geared v ball? Always used a simple ball for my 35mm work....I have an old Bogen tripod that came with the used equip I purchased and I think it's very difficult to work with due to the extreme weight. Although, it would make a great studio tripod.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    73

    Re: Tripods: any major difference between

    I bought a used Ries thirty years ago and it's still my only LF 'pod. That's saying something.

  3. #3
    -Rob bigcameraworkshops.com Robert Skeoch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Burlington, Ontario
    Posts
    520

    Re: Tripods: any major difference between

    I use a wood Berlebach... I think it's great.
    -Rob

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,067

    Re: Tripods: any major difference between

    Nothing beats a Majestic Tripod....in the studio.
    Are you hiking? Biking? Taking camera/tripod out of Hummer and going for a 5 mile walk or within site of your car?
    I've hiked with a Bogen 3221 + medium format and I'm faily fit. I cycle a few hundred miles a week. That thing hurt.
    Next hiking tripod for me will be CF.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,498

    Re: Tripods: any major difference between

    Some people work out of their car trunks and a heavy tripod plus geared head isn't an issue. Weight is a feature and an important one if you want to be mobile and walk or hike long distance with your gear. A good CF tripod is rigid and light, and a high quality ballhead like an Arca Swiss B1 is relatively light and compact. Anti-rotation is a convenience that makes it easier to lock and unlock tripod legs. It's nice to have, but I have an older Gitzo CF without it and it's no big deal.

  6. #6
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Re: Tripods: any major difference between

    I think the anti-rotation legs and the short-throw collars on the new Gitzo tripods are a real improvement. They're as fast as the cam locks on a Bogen/Manfrotto now. The main thing that kept me from buying a Gitzo in the past was the locking collar system.

    Ries tripods are very nicely made, but heavy compared to CF. Heavy isn't necessarily a bad thing in a tripod, if you don't have to carry it long distances. CF and wood both have good vibration damping properties.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    134

    Re: Tripods: any major difference between

    I'm not planning on 5 mile hikes. I would like to be able to pack my equipment on my back and climb up a simple trail or down steep stairs leading to some scenic area. The Bogen has nice features, but it's a heavy sucker. For the time I can take my Cambo apart and reassemble w/o too much trouble. So a decent tripod is more important at this time I think.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    77

    Re: Tripods: any major difference between

    Carbon fiber is light and convenient. My Gitzo with the Arca Swiss ball head is also super solid. I have never owned a wooden tripod but several of my LF friends use wooden tripods (mainly Zone VI). I prefer the carbon fiber.

    Sincerely,

    Hany.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: Tripods: any major difference between

    "A bit" heavier is an understatement. Wood tripods in general are a whole lot heavier than CF for comparable weight capacities. Back in the days before carbon fiber, comparable metal and wood tripods were roughly the same weight. Today, with CF being available and prices of CF having come down, I don't get the appeal of wood outside the studio but many obviously do.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Huntington, Long Island, NY
    Posts
    167

    Re: Tripods: any major difference between

    It took me one LF photo session to convince me to get a CF tripod. I just have to spend the bucks - they are pretty expensive.

Similar Threads

  1. Berlebach Tripods
    By Rob "John Henry" Rothman in forum Gear
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 21-Apr-2009, 04:31
  2. What's the deal with Linhof Tripods ?
    By Ron Bose in forum Gear
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 18-Feb-2007, 06:50
  3. Carbon fibre tripods - comments please?
    By Peter Brown in forum Gear
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 27-Aug-2001, 18:28
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 4-Nov-2000, 16:17
  5. Berlebach tripods from Calumet
    By David Grandy in forum Gear
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 30-Apr-1999, 22:07

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •