Non traditional photographs

[Donald Miller]

The overwhelming preponderance seems to be threads showing photographs of a traditional (typically representational) nature. How about a thread showing some photographs of a more abstract nature? I will begin with this recent one.

[Bill_1856]

WOW! That's absolutely gorgeous. I hope your printing technique is up to maintaining the brilliance of the composition. (I'd love to have one, but I'm broke.)

[Michael Graves]

Does this qualify?

[Matt Miller]

How about a thread showing some photographs of a more abstract nature?

I know I just used this in a recent thread, but it's a scan I have on hand, and fits here as well.

[Donald Miller]

Thanks Bill,

Matt and Michael, both nice images as well. I especially like the metal Matt...reminds me of some of Brett W's images.

[Kirk Gittings]

Nice image Donald, but .......

"Abstract" images are traditional at this point. Abstraction in photography is at least 70 years old as a valid subject matter. Representational makes more sense than traditional. When "abstracts" have been a common classification at the local camera club for the last 30 years (as long as I have been volunteering as a judge), they are traditional.

[adrian tyler]

happy christmas, new year and kings:

[chris_4622]

4x5 negative scan.

[domenico Foschi]

The overwhelming preponderance seems to be threads showing photographs of a traditional (typically representational) nature. How about a thread showing some photographs of a more abstract nature? I will begin with this recent one.

Donald, your work is excellent!

[vinny]

here goes