First of all, let me apologize up front for asking something I know has been discussed to death, in bits and pieces, many times and in many places. But I'm hoping people with direct experience with this can make it clearer for me (or at least more interestingly murky).
I've found that recently, the vast majority of my photography, at least that which I want to print, is in B&W. I have an Epson 7600, which for all its life has been used with Ultrachrome Ink (Matte and Light black).
Now that I'm shooting primarily for B&W, I'm considering switching to one of the various 3rd party B&W inksets out there. But I'm not sure how much benefit there is to doing this, and I'm also confused about some of the options and tradeoffs.
Right now I'm using QTR with the Epson inks on the enhanced matte paper. At the risk of revealing myself to have impossibly low standards, the prints look pretty OK to me. But I've never done a direct side-by-side comparison with the output of other inks, so perhaps there's something beyond "pretty OK" that I could be getting with better inks. I just don't know.
Complicating things is the fact that some of my prints benefit from a bit of sepia toning, while for others I prefer to print them neutral. I know that at least some of the third party inksets are specific to neutral/cold/warm/sepia.
It seems to cost about $1k to switch inks (a flushing set plus the first set of new inks), so I'm not exactly interested in doing this on a whim (especially if I might end up switching inksets several times before I find one I like best). And right now I can still print color if I want.
So how much of an improvement am I likely to see by switching inks? And any suggestions for which inksets I should be investigating (based on my desire to print both toned and untoned) if I do decide to switch?
Thanks
Bookmarks