Huh? I don't have a clue what you are saying Bob, but think I will pass whatever it is.
Huh? I don't have a clue what you are saying Bob, but think I will pass whatever it is.
Doug,
Why are you getting the scans done in India? IMHO, big risk to save a few bucks. I always insist JaincoTech does the scanning in the US. Retouching of image files are done in India, but the chromes stay on this continent.
Just checked the unsharpened chromes I have had done on the 949 by JaincoTech and they look great. No problems at all making crisp 22 x 28 prints (using the Pixel Genius sharpening routines). As an aside, JaincoTech also have an IQ3, so if your not happy with the Imacon Scans, there is an alternative. And of course, it is really tough to beat Ted's Cezanne scans. Best scans of B&W negs I have ever experienced.
Basically was offering you some large flex prints from your files at very high mag.
Originally Posted by Doug Dolde
Bob, Thanks but I have a large format printer.
Jainco required me to use their India facility to get them for $16. Otherwise they were raising my price to about double that. It's not that risky.
Is there any possibility of including the Imacon 949, the 700, and the 750 scanners in the Collaborative Scanning Compariosn? It sounds like we have decent access to these scanners.
These are the scanners that people would like to compare.
I added another comparison pair:
http://www.painted-with-light.com/scan3.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks