Flowers Anyone?

[Kerik Kouklis]

Thanks, guys. I'm not seeing pink/green - if you're picking that up it's likely an artifact of scanning not the process. The directional thing you see is (somewhat intentional) sloppiness in development. BTW, the first one was shot with a 305mm Kodak Portrait at f/6.3.

[Darryl Baird]

I think the second image is really excellent, the almost diamond shape of the developing marks, vignetting, together with the overall composition just sings. I'm hoping to get to try my hand at wetplate in a few weeks, so its good to know you like the portrait lens.

[xmishx]

Kerik,

Really stunning work. You have that collodian process down!

Ted

[Victo]

Two gerbera's

fp4 4x5" symmar 210

[xavier deltell]

Sinar P, Schneider Apo Symmar 210, . Shot on Provia 4x5.F 16 . Developed in Tetenal E-6 Scanned with Imacon scanner and resized.

[Brian Bullen]

Wild Columbine
Crop from 11x14 x-ray film/palladium print

[Jan Pedersen]

Brain, Beautiful print. What lens did you use for this one?

jan

[Brian Bullen]

Thank you Jan!
The lens is very rare, very expensive and highly sought after.
Just kidding, it's only a simple and very cheap B+L projection lens. I think I paid $20 for it.
If anyone has the 18" version send me a pm, this one doesn't quite cover my 11x14.

[Jim Galli]

Thank you Jan!
The lens is very rare, very expensive and highly sought after.
Just kidding, it's only a simple and very cheap B+L projection lens. I think I paid $20 for it.
If anyone has the 18" version send me a pm, this one doesn't quite cover my 11x14.

Brian, You're doing some great stuff with that xray film.

[Brian Bullen]

Brian, You're doing some great stuff with that xray film.

Thanks Jim, I must have missed this post, your compliments mean a lot.
Here is another 8x10 x-ray/ palladium