What are the going prices for scanning 4x5 and 8x10 film with a Cezanne or a Creo Eversmart Pro II or equivalent.
I am trying to work out how many shots I'd have to do before I'd save money.
Thanks,
Asher
Thanks a million Joe, Sandy and Ted and Brian too. This has been a wealth of information. That's why I gave this thread 5 stars. I tried to find the Genesis site last night, but Ted had it spelled Gensis which makes it more difficult. This is not going to be a "I have to have by this by the weekend" type purchase. Getting one of these will have to fill a need (scanning negs and tranies) that I honestly don't have at the moment. If the copy film I used back in the '80's was still available, I would have gone the high end scanner route years ago. But instead I am using the technology at hand (a work around if you will) for my work flow. On another thread discussing Traditional Photography has repeaked an old idea for a custom wet lab I had in the '80s. Possibly if a demand for film processing re-merged I will be looking into setting up an auto E-6 processor with high end scanning capabilities. I know for sure that there is basically no demand here in Toledo for large format processing but making a larger net presense is what I need to do. As of date, I easily handle any demand for E-6 with my roll tank and homemade water bath. I learned from starting this business before on two attempts that it's better to have a demand than trying to fill it. Something to ponder.
A special note to Ted: Thanks for your offer, I was being facetious with my comment about Epi and Nikon. Didn't mean for you to rant. After 9:00am is my bed time sometimes people don't get my sarcasism. I am full aware that you get what you pay for. They wouldn't be asking the $$$ if they weren't worth it.
Greg Lockrey
Wealth is a state of mind.
Money is just a tool.
Happiness is pedaling +25mph on a smooth road.
Joe (jetcode) summed it up pretty well. He bought his machine on time that will cost about $200 per month, or the equivelent of 2 high end large format scans. You will have to look honestly what your need truly is verses having one in your spare bedroom. You can make a lot of scans for $6k+.
Greg Lockrey
Wealth is a state of mind.
Money is just a tool.
Happiness is pedaling +25mph on a smooth road.
Greg, I was estimating the cost per month but that truly depends on financial charges and banking institutions. Thank Ted, Sandy, and Brian. They have far more professional experience to offer then I do. I am two steps in front of you and a couple of million steps behind them.
Asher,
60 scans at $100 a scan covers the cost of the scanner I bought except I get to work with a scan as much as I want until it meets the criteria I am looking for in an image. What's truly nice about have a high resolution scanner is that I may find an image within an image (the real image or one of many) and scan that at a higher resolution. I can also get a scan whenever I want 24/7.
Yes...this is a very relevent subject. The "average" price to have someone scan this on one of these high end scanners. At the same time, one can even "charge" someone something like $50 for a scan and make money to offset the initial investment...perhaps even making money off it all in the end. Not sure how much time/labor/etc. is involved to give someone the results they are expected at $50 a pop, but I know if it is about 3 hours to do, that's not bad.
But put into perspective the costs of a 5-6K scanner that will yield 60 scansX$100 is a very sufficient point and IMHO, way worth the investment. I mean, think of all the photos one will do in say, the next 5-10 years. Just put in 5 years as an example. I'm sure I'll shoot 500 4X5 shots in 5 years "easily". Of those 500 shots, I would expect to see at least a 20 percent ratio of must have drum scanned/keepers...not to say the others would be a waist, but 20 percent, giving it a super low ratio of top end shots vs. gallery based photos, but not your very best. SO in that 5 year period, you did 100 scans=$10,000.
It's early and I'm redundantly repetitive as usual.
Excellent thread and thanks to everyone and their words.
I'm not yet convinced a drum scan is necessary, that is, until I have more time to evaluate real prints from the different films I want to use. The scanner I selected allows me to batch scan as many images as I can get on the bed. I can use the scanner to preview film, scan once, edit once, print forever at different image sizes for different medias. I can scan watercolors and other reflective art which will offset the cost. I save money in shipping costs for outside scans. And I suspect the scan quality is very high for the scanner I selected. What's not to like?
Joe, the scanner you go tis every bit as good as a drum scanner. It cost the same new and performs as well (takes up as much space too as you now know). It outperformed a bunch of drum scanners in the Seybold test.
Bookmarks