Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Bicycling w/LF

  1. #11
    Greg Lockrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Temperance, MI
    Posts
    1,980

    Re: Bicycling w/LF

    Your'e not ever going to like carrying anything on your back while riding. Find a way to haul your gear on a rear platform. Put a lot of foam rubber to absorb the road shocks. Your can use your handlebars for the tripod. If your bike has front and rear pannier frames, so much the better. What kind of bike are your riding, BTW?
    Greg Lockrey

    Wealth is a state of mind.
    Money is just a tool.
    Happiness is pedaling +25mph on a smooth road.



  2. #12
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,222

    Re: Bicycling w/LF

    Hello Steve!

    I hope your next trip out is more comfortable! I am trying to picture the pack you got -- I picture a big lumpy thing that sits in the small of your back.

    I had a large daypack that I used for my lightweight 4x5 system. It was a top-loader, which is not as nice as a front panel loader, but it was relatively tall, average width, but not too deep. It kept my gear spread out evenly along my back, and no weight sticking too far off my back. It also had a removable closed cell pad that was stored inside the pack right against my back -- it kept equipment from sticking into my back (and could be sat on for when I photographed in snow, on wet or cold ground, or on ground with little sharp annoying rocks.)

    I put in a 2" layer of soft foam on the bottom of the pack to protect the equipment when I set the pack down. I made a foam enclosure for the 4x5 and that went into a stuff sack -- it fit in perfectly down into the bottom of the daypack. In next would go my lens (in a Calumet lens wrap) and the 6 film holders (each in its own zip-loc, then all in a small stuff sack), then the Pentax digi spot, a small stuff sack full of little accessories (lupe, lens cleaner, cable releace, etc) and the darkcloth. The pack had two detachable side pockets, each long enough for two water bottles, if I need to carry food and water.

    It worked well. I bike-toured 5 months in New Zealand with it. When I had the whole bike loaded up, the camera pack got strapped on top of the tent, sleeping pad, tripod, and sleeping bag that were stapped crossway on the back rack. But once I got to an area I was going to photograph in, the front and rear panniers got taken off and left in my tent or the youth hostle, and I put the camera pack on my back, the pod strapped to the rear rack and off I'd go. I often would leave the bike and hike around, so having the pack ready-to-go was nice.

    I did notice that I rarely photographed while I was riding with my full load -- the hassle of unpacking the bike to get to the camera stuff was too much. And as slow as bike travel is (especially over passes with 80+ pounds of gear/food on the bike!), I still prefer walking when searching for light to photograph. But even with the unloaded bike, I tended to discover light to photograph after I got off of it and got to walking around.

    Vaughn

  3. #13
    Steve Gombosi
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    57

    Re: Bicycling w/LF

    The pack is this one:

    http://www.mountainsmith.com/product...bCategory2Id=0

    The addition of the "strapettes":

    http://www.mountainsmith.com/product...bCategory2Id=0

    has improved things greatly. Main compartment carries Tachi, wrapped 270mm Tele-Arton, and 545i holder, meter, and filter wallet. Zippered pocket inside main compartment carries loupe. Outer compartment carries 40 Quickloads (overkill for me). BTZS Darkcloth is wrapped around the Tachi. 90mm Angulon and 180mm Nikkor-W have each fit in, of all things, Hasselblad magazine cases which fit quite handily into the mesh water bottle pockets on either side of the pack. These close completely shut with a drawstring. I would've put them on the belt of the pack itself, but the belt is 2" and the belt loop on the magazine cases is only 1 1/2". I may try just putting them on the strapettes.

    You can't see it from the pictures, but this little pack has a very well-designed lumbar pad and is really constructed like a tiny, internal frame pack. It's quite comfortable even with a fairly heavy load and it's surprisingly roomy: I could fit a 5x7 in it if I had someplace for the lenses. Does anybody
    make a large-format lens case with belt loops (preferably 2")? It would be more convenient if I had lens cases that I could just attach to the belt.

    It top-loads, which is actually quite nice under the circumstances - I don't have to take it off or
    set it down to have access to equipment. It also has bottom straps which work nicely for a tripod.
    The strapettes are, in fact, well-padded backpack straps with a sternum strap. They really distribute the weight quite well.

    I haven't tried it with conventional holders or Graphmatics yet.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaughn View Post
    Hello Steve!

    I hope your next trip out is more comfortable! I am trying to picture the pack you got -- I picture a big lumpy thing that sits in the small of your back.

    I had a large daypack that I used for my lightweight 4x5 system. It was a top-loader, which is not as nice as a front panel loader, but it was relatively tall, average width, but not too deep. It kept my gear spread out evenly along my back, and no weight sticking too far off my back. It also had a removable closed cell pad that was stored inside the pack right against my back -- it kept equipment from sticking into my back (and could be sat on for when I photographed in snow, on wet or cold ground, or on ground with little sharp annoying rocks.)

    I put in a 2" layer of soft foam on the bottom of the pack to protect the equipment when I set the pack down. I made a foam enclosure for the 4x5 and that went into a stuff sack -- it fit in perfectly down into the bottom of the daypack. In next would go my lens (in a Calumet lens wrap) and the 6 film holders (each in its own zip-loc, then all in a small stuff sack), then the Pentax digi spot, a small stuff sack full of little accessories (lupe, lens cleaner, cable releace, etc) and the darkcloth. The pack had two detachable side pockets, each long enough for two water bottles, if I need to carry food and water.

    It worked well. I bike-toured 5 months in New Zealand with it. When I had the whole bike loaded up, the camera pack got strapped on top of the tent, sleeping pad, tripod, and sleeping bag that were stapped crossway on the back rack. But once I got to an area I was going to photograph in, the front and rear panniers got taken off and left in my tent or the youth hostle, and I put the camera pack on my back, the pod strapped to the rear rack and off I'd go. I often would leave the bike and hike around, so having the pack ready-to-go was nice.

    I did notice that I rarely photographed while I was riding with my full load -- the hassle of unpacking the bike to get to the camera stuff was too much. And as slow as bike travel is (especially over passes with 80+ pounds of gear/food on the bike!), I still prefer walking when searching for light to photograph. But even with the unloaded bike, I tended to discover light to photograph after I got off of it and got to walking around.

    Vaughn

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Flower Mound, Tx
    Posts
    27

    Re: Bicycling w/LF

    For those reading this thread and considering trailers - The Bob trailers have single wheels and track your bike. If you miss a pothole with the bike, the trailer will also miss the pothole. I also like the suggestion of carrying lenses (the only fragile part of LF) on your body. You can lift off the saddle to avoid a big bump. For lenses I would suggest a fanny pack which does not put extra stress on your body while cycling.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Suffolk, UK
    Posts
    158

    Re: Bicycling w/LF

    Quote Originally Posted by Ed Brock View Post
    I also like the suggestion of carrying lenses (the only fragile part of LF) on your body.
    What about your ground glass?

  6. #16
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,222

    Re: Bicycling w/LF

    Quote Originally Posted by keeds View Post
    What about your ground glass?
    I never had problems with the GG in transportation -- it should be tightly held in (for best focusing and to keep it from rattling around on the camera back.) And the camera should be packed so that nothing can hit the GG.

    That said, when I traveled for 5+ months on my bike, I carried an extra GG in a old 4x5 film box just in case. I also carried a pinhole in case something happened to my lens. Fortunately I never needed to use either.

    Steve,

    While that looks like a great little pack, it would not be the style I would choose for myself for comfort. Also I would prefer the lenses to be inside the pack for max protection.

    I carried my lens in the front right pannier of my bike -- thinking that if I crashed, I would try to crash on the left side (away from the lens and derailer). Of course when I did crash (drifted off the side of a gravel road on a curve and hit some rocks), I went over the handle bars, the front wheel turned a full 180 degrees and I had absolutely no control over anything. Only minor injuries to me and the bike, none to the camera gear.

    The kicker was that this was on a 140 km stretch of gravel road -- about 100 meters before it became pavement again. It was also on Christmas Day...so it goes.

    Vaughn

Similar Threads

  1. shooting the moon w/LF
    By L. H. Nichols in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 9-Aug-2000, 12:59
  2. Bicycling with LF
    By Larry Huppert in forum Gear
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 28-Jul-2000, 23:26

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •