Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    137

    Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

    Wouldn't you know it... just as we're about to finish up on the molds for our 5x7 Film Holders... a discrepancy pops up...

    the ANSI specification for 5x7 film holder thickness is 0.562 inches, so that's what we started tooling for. In the meantime, we picked up samples of various 5x7 holders (no Toyo's though)... none of which have the same thickness, and none of which agrees with the ANSI spec.

    Would someone who has a Toyo 5x7 film holder please measure the thickness?

    Better yet, would someone be willing to donate a Toyo 5x7 film holder for an autopsy? We would glady return 2 of our new film holders as a thank you for the donation.

  2. #2

    Re: Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

    Why do you care what the Toyo holder is? Go with the ANSI spec and don't worry about that others have done.

    Are you seeing T distance discrepancies?


    ---Michael

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    137

    Re: Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Mutmansky View Post
    Why do you care what the Toyo holder is? Go with the ANSI spec and don't worry about that others have done.

    Are you seeing T distance discrepancies?


    ---Michael
    Michael, we promised everyone film holders as closely matching Toyo's as possible. Knowing Toyo, I suspect their thickness dimension would be spot on... but I just want to make sure. Along with verifying overall dimensions, we have observed design and manufacturing differences between Toyo 4x5 and 8x10 holders... small details that have us wondering about their execution of the 5x7's.

    We have seen variation in T distances, but honestly all of the samples we procured were pretty well used... I wouldn't make any statements in this regard based on the samples we inspected.

  4. #4

    Re: Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

    HOw wide is the variance? Is it within manufacturer tolerances? If you are seeing changes in a range of 0.560 to 0.564 or maybe even a little bit higher I would say you don't have to worry about it too much. barring that, then I would follow ANSI specs, certainly better than using what Toyo does. I beleive ( and I migfht be wrong) than Linhof has once upon a time 5x7 holders, you might want to contact Bob Solomon and ask him to give you a hand with the measurements they used. There were no better made holders than those from Linhof.

    Good luck, and let me know when you are ready for 12x20 or 8x10..

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Gresham OR
    Posts
    1,374

    Re: Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

    Sorry, can't help with Toyo holder but look forward to see the finished Fotoman 5x7

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Posts
    3,804

    Re: Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Droluk View Post
    ...Knowing Toyo, I suspect their thickness dimension would be spot on... but I just want to make sure...
    No Toyo 5x7 holders here Paul, but I just measured a half dozen 5x7 Liscos. They ran from 0.503 to 0.515 inch.

    A holder's T-depth is critical, but I don't think outside thickness is. Holder thickness can vary based on how thick the septum is. As long as you maintain a seating surface exactly one "T" from the septum, it doesn't matter if your holders are 0.5 or 0.6 thick. I can't think of a camera back that wouldn't accommodate anything in that range.

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Droluk View Post
    ...We have seen variation in T distances, but honestly all of the samples we procured were pretty well used... I wouldn't make any statements in this regard based on the samples we inspected.
    I won't tell you how much variation there is in the T-depth of these 5x7 Liscos, since I won't bother to measure it. Based on similar 4x5 holders I did measure for that parameter when brand new some years ago it's probably significant from holder to holder as well as side to side on each holder. Nothing out of the Burbank plant could be accused of displaying great precision. I did check my Toyo 4x5 and 8x10 holders; all measure T-depth within 0.003 inch of the ANSI standard.

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,640

    Re: Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

    So long as it doesn't affect structural integrity, I would err in the direction of thinner rather than thicker. As Sal says, it's the T-distance that really matters.

    For 5x7 I use mostly a stack of late-model Fidelity holders that measure a hair thicker than 0.5", and those work very well for me. I have some older, thicker holders too, but my Nagaoka is not entirely thrilled about swallowing them.

  8. #8
    All metric sizes to 24x30 Ole Tjugen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,383

    Re: Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

    I can measure my 13x18cm Linhof holders next weekend, but not now - I'm on an oil rig.

    I can't say I've noticed any difference in dimensions between Lisco, Fidelity and Linhof though - except the "Linhof Universal Film- und Platten-Doppelkassetten (mit Auswerfer)" which are thicker..

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,599

    Re: Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

    Wouldn't the Toyo 5x7 holders be the same thickness as Toyo 4x5 holders?
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    137

    Re: Fotoman 5x7 Film Holder - Thickness

    Quote Originally Posted by John Kasaian View Post
    Wouldn't the Toyo 5x7 holders be the same thickness as Toyo 4x5 holders?
    Actually, the ANSI thickness spec for thickness is different for 4x5 and 5x7 (0.520 vs. 0.562).

    Our concern regarding thickness ultimately has to do with holder weight. Complying with both the ANSI "T" distance AND thickness spec's for 5x7 holders will lead to a heavier holder. Indeed, all of the samples we have seen so far are thinner than the ANSI spec, closer or the same as for 4x5... probably for the very same reason. Obviously meeting the "T" distance is mandatory, but thickness will likely not make a difference in any cameras that we are aware of... we would simply like to know what Toyo did.

    As far as "why Toyo"... we've now had an opportunity to disect a lot of holders (though not every maker, every size), and from what we've seen so far, the Toyo's are better designed and manufactured than the others... it's in the attention to detail and the lack of short-cutting. More parts and more assembly time required, which results in a more solidly finished product. Personally, while I started using anybody's holders, I wound up using Toyo's exclusively. I just thought they felt better... after this exercise I think I know why.

Similar Threads

  1. New Fuji Quckchange holder, holds 8 pieces of sheet film!
    By Bill Glickman in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 13-Sep-2008, 21:56
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 8-May-2007, 12:31
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20-Aug-2004, 16:27
  4. Multi Sheet Film Loader + Film Holder
    By Jon Miller in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 29-Jul-2000, 21:51

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •