NO. And the (new and wonderful) search engine is at the main entry http://http.cs.berkeley.edu/~qtluong/photography/lf/index.html
NO. And the (new and wonderful) search engine is at the main entry http://http.cs.berkeley.edu/~qtluong/photography/lf/index.html
It ain't broke, so don't fix it.
No. Love it as it is
I ts hould be part ofphoto.net the same way that the Nature and Medium Format fo rums are: there and linked but seperate from the general photography forum. The purpose of these forums is educatiuon not clique-ism.
Well, it would be good to have a search function, and also to be able to follow the history of individuals' posts (one of the best features of photo.net), but photo.net and this forum have rather different characters. So, please leave this site where it is, but please add a little more user-friendly functionality if possible.
I'm pretty content with the site as is. It really has taught me a ton about LF. If it gets moved I'll participate anyway unless it gets bgged down with a ton on blinking advertisements or becomes somehow diluted with non-LF information. I say keep it where it is. I say thanks to the people who make it possible and to all who participate.
rr
I recently found this form and the format as it is now. People generally are informative and polite. This is often not the case in some other forms.
jeez, people. I think all Tuan is thinking about tis having the link on photo.ne t Q&A page under "community." It will help people who have an interest in LF find this amazing site faster and more directly.
This is my favorite site I like my own search engine its more fun this way! If it aint broke way fix it!
I've noticed that since they upgraded Photo.net that the speed has slowed considerably. I just got into LF and the first thing I noticed, when visiting this forum, it is much faster than Photo.net
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks