Paul: I've only seen the high-end Eizo's from afar. The FlexScan models are high end enough for me. They appear to have the same build quality as the the higher end ones, jus tnot as many bells and whistles. The frames are metal and they are sturdy. Before I decided to buy them for our workshops, where it is critical that they calibrate and stay calibrated ... even with shipping back and forth across the country .... I checked with X-Rite and got a flat out answr that ALL Eizo monitors calibrate rapidly, easily and stay calibrated. That was all I needed.
As for the LaCie gathering dust. If you decide you want to take a drive up here just shout and you get free shooting in beautiful NH as well as a monitor .
cool, i'm juggling my options right now. and waiting to hear what the t.v. repair shack has to say about my dead baby. my climbing partner and i may be heading up to the white mountains one of these weekends, so if i decide the eizo's too dear, and a perfect sony or lacie doesn't rain down from heaven, i may be driving up your way.
Paul, just give me a heads up and a few hours notice
Like Struan, I use a cinema display at work. It's great for graphics and surfing the web, but I don't care for it for photography. It doesn't offer true calibration, and the colors and contrast are exagerated. And like most LCDs, it puts an outline around the individual pixels that I can see ... which gives a kind of artificial sharpening effect that makes me crazy. And the contrast changes a fair amount when I move my head around.
Does anyone have a sense of how the Eizo FlexScan measures up with regard to these annoyances? The coloredge that I saw had none of them.
JWI had to keep my brightness at ZERO percent just to set my white/black points.
That sounds strange. What form of monitor calibration are you using?
Thanks,
Kirk
at age 73:
"The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep"
I was lucky. I purchased a LaCie Electron Blue a couple of months before they stopped production.
I currently have two monitors side-by-side, and switch to an old NEC when I'm not doing color corrections. I want this thing to last.
As to LaCie's found on Craigslist, I have a friend who's purchased three of these in the Portland area. (LaCie's home base is located near Portland.) Two of the three are defective.
The last few generations of what used to be adobe's gamma control panel, now incorporated in the OSX monitor calibration routine seem to have been quite good. Indeed it works for almost anything I need to do... and I'd recently gotten some lightjet tests done of some tricky images in terms of highlight and shadow detail. I have to say I've been VERY pleased with the results. And, well - sorry if I seem ignorant (believe me though - I've been wrestling with color cal for YEARS and YEARS!!) - but that's really all that matters to me - getting the results I want. Yes, anyway - I know how nutty it must sound - but I figure that the 'brightness' control on the monitor is a variable 'range' controlling the gun voltage. Perhaps it's miscalibrated (the brightness control) but regardless - there seems to be no shortage of photons flying out of the back of the thing. I'm assuming that'll mean there will be PILES of latitude for a progressively dimming monitor.
Bookmarks