Andreas Gursky's 99 cent II, Diptych, from 2001 sold for $3.3 million last night at Sothebey's London
Andreas Gursky's 99 cent II, Diptych, from 2001 sold for $3.3 million last night at Sothebey's London
I've never seen it. It's difficult to imagine just how wonderful, magnificent, magical a photograph must be to be worth so much money!
Mike
You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn
www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog
I should add - how can a digital print fade faster than a normal print when they are both produced on the same materials?Originally Posted by davidbram
Is that the digital print that has faded already?
You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn
www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog
At $3.3M it's not "fading", it's "evolving with time".
Greg Lockrey
Wealth is a state of mind.
Money is just a tool.
Happiness is pedaling +25mph on a smooth road.
errr... I don't think it's fading (at least no more than any of that funny colour stuff does "real men only photograph in B&W")
You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn
www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog
WOW...and to think I've had friends killed trying to produce photo stories that would net less than a grand in Newsweek...
You see, who says that you can't make a living as a fine Art photographer?
Bought with OPM?
Wilhelm (Sarasota)
Bookmarks