Has anyone shot with both Rodenstock N and S lenses and closely compared the two ? If so, can you see ANY difference in resolution or sharpness--or general qual ity--between the two lens lines? I am already aware that the S has a larger cir cle of coverage, and am not concerned with that per se, but rather in any possib le difference in resolution or sharpness, as well as general quality of image. I would be particulary interested to hear from anyone who has made large prints from film shot with the two lenses, as I am making mural-size enlargements (from 4 x 5 B/W negatives), and am curious if the performance between the two would o nly be visible in a larger print or not.
Bookmarks