Kill threads after the second page...

[Frank Petronio]

I haven't seen anything worth reading or participating in after the second page -- usually they just devolve into pissing matches between two or three stubborn individuals, of whom at least one has really poor reading/social skills.

You could just lock them after 50 or so posts... it save bandwidth.

(Just an observation, not serious, I rather like watching the blow-outs sometimes.)

[Frank Petronio]

I dunno, I thought the High End Digital thread was stillborn to begin with but to each his own. Two of those guys droaned on for at least 20-30 back and forth brickbrats. And they like to write longwinded posts...

[Steve H]

Perhaps check out the picture post thread then

[Sal Santamaura]

You could just lock them after 50 or so posts... it save bandwidth.

Frank, if bandwidth conservation is your interest, why not suggest eliminating images and avatars. Aren't multiple text pages are a drop in the bucket by comparison?

[BrianShaw]

Is there a problem with bandwidth?

[Frank Petronio]

Sorry, never mind, you guys are right. I was more trying to comment that a lot -- but not all -- of the longer threads get stupider as they go on.

[BrianShaw]

Sorry, never mind, you guys are right. I was more trying to comment that a lot -- but not all -- of the longer threads get stupider as they go on.

Now, that's a FACT!

[ADG]

Let's see if we can spin this out to 50 posts, just to annoy Frank
Maybe there should be a prize for post No 50...?

[Ralph Barker]

Let's see if we can spin this out to 50 posts, just to annoy Frank
Maybe there should be a prize for post No 50...?

Nah, the prize goes to the 51st post, but only if it contains useful, on-topic information.

[paulr]

So what's better, film or digital???