Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Jobo processing & contrast

  1. #1

    Jobo processing & contrast

    I have a CPE but have been hesitant to use it for sheet or roll film development because I have always heard that constant agitation leads to contrast build up. Most of my photos are of high contrast subjects anyway (lots of architecture in bright sunlight) so the additional theoretical contrast would be very unwelcome. I have been using a HP Combi but the negs keep slipping out of their slots and end up touching other negs and leaving marks so I am looking for an alternative.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,908

    Re: Jobo processing & contrast

    Don't be overly concerned about the contrast build up.
    Reduce your development time by 20-25% as a starting point.
    Upon inspectionof the dry negatives you may wish to further reduce the developmen time a little more, or you may find you need to reduce it a little less. 20-25% usually works for my students.
    Variable contrast paper will be a big help in ending up with a print of appropriate contrast.
    Jim

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,955

    Re: Jobo processing & contrast

    My N-2 negatives develop nicely in the Jobo 3010, using D76 1:1. But I did development tests to determine the correct times with my system for N-2 to N+2.

    My times are much shorter than I was using in the Combi.

  4. #4

    Re: Jobo processing & contrast

    Thanks for the responses. I was under the impression that intermittent development allowed some compensating action as the heavily exposed areas slowed down the developer adjacent to them and the developer worked more on the lightly exposed areas. Is this effect overstated?

  5. #5
    Resident Heretic Bruce Watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA, North Carolina
    Posts
    3,362

    Re: Jobo processing & contrast

    Quote Originally Posted by Warren Williams
    Thanks for the responses. I was under the impression that intermittent development allowed some compensating action as the heavily exposed areas slowed down the developer adjacent to them and the developer worked more on the lightly exposed areas. Is this effect overstated?
    IMHO, there is little to no compensation action with normal intermittent agitation. You get compensation through developer starvation which implies stand development.

    Bruce Watson

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Minden, Nevada
    Posts
    79

    Re: Jobo processing & contrast

    My experience is consistent with what has already been posted. Here is an article by John Hicks on the Unblinking Eye website: http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Rotary/rotary.html

Similar Threads

  1. E6 jobo processing
    By tim atherton in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 23-May-2006, 11:28
  2. contrast control with rotary processing
    By Richard Littlewood in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2-Dec-2004, 09:22
  3. Jobo Processing
    By Richard White in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 18-Nov-2004, 12:10
  4. Prewet with Jobo Processing
    By William Marderness in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2000, 23:47
  5. JOBO Processing Question
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 3-Dec-1998, 12:49

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •