Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Film Holder as Reducing Back

  1. #1

    Film Holder as Reducing Back

    Does anyone know of an 8x10 sized film holder that accepts 4x5 film? Such a film holder would serve as an inexpensive and universal reducing back. Can a film ho lder be modified to accept smaller film?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    75

    Film Holder as Reducing Back

    I modified a couple of 8x10 holders to 4x10 buy gluing down small pieces of plastic inside the holder onto the septum of the 8x10 holder. Do under stand that this made the holder unusable for 8x10.
    _______________________
    George Losse
    www.georgelosse.com

  3. #3
    Robert A. Zeichner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Southfield, Michigan
    Posts
    1,091

    Film Holder as Reducing Back

    There is an inherent problem in doing this sort of thing. The depth tolerance for 5x7 and 8x10 is progressively looser than it is for 4x5. It is therefore possible that an 8x10 holder would suspend the film within the specified location for acceptable focus on 8x10 film, but clearly out of the specified location for equally acceptable results on 4x5 film.

  4. #4
    Robert A. Zeichner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Southfield, Michigan
    Posts
    1,091

    Film Holder as Reducing Back

    I checked my data files for the specifics in case you're curious. The ANSI spec for photographic film holders (Z38.1.51-1951) states that the depth for a 4x5 holder is 0.197" +/- 0.007". For a 5x7 holder it's 0.228" +/- 0.010". For 8x10 it's 0.260" +/- 0.016". As you can see, unless whatever device used for holding 4x5 sheet film in a larger holder also moved the film closer to the lens, your results would most likely be noticeably out of focus!

  5. #5

    Film Holder as Reducing Back

    Not necessarily true. The 8x10 ground glass in the 8x10 back is still calibrated for the 8x10 film depth and hence this will work although the tolerance for error is greater.

  6. #6
    Robert A. Zeichner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Southfield, Michigan
    Posts
    1,091

    Film Holder as Reducing Back

    Assuming the groundglass is dead nuts perfect (they seldom are) and that the film holder depth is centered within the specified tolerance, you might get acceptable results. The chances of this are slim. Using a film holder as a reducing back is crude at best. I've seen too many cameras with gg's out of alignment to a degree that use of film holders of the correct size yields less than perfect results. Let's get serious here. If you're working in 8x10, isn't it a safe assumption that you can afford 8x10 film? And if you can afford that why not just get a reducing back made for the camera? If no such back is made, perhaps a reducing back for another type of camera could be adapted. At least this way there is some chance of the gg being in proper alignment with the average film holder.

  7. #7

    Film Holder as Reducing Back

    Actually, I can afford 8x10 film (B+W), but not for the testing I am doing. I found a reducing film holder on ebay, and will use it with 4x5 film to make density tests. I do not want to buy a $400 reducing back, nor do I want to carry it around. If the reducing film holder works okay, I will use it for color film, since I cannot afford 8x10 color film.

  8. #8
    Robert A. Zeichner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Southfield, Michigan
    Posts
    1,091

    Film Holder as Reducing Back

    OK, I see your point. Do you have access to a collimator? If you can get the use of one for an hour or two, you can "calibrate" an 8x10 holder for use with 4x5 film. What you need to do is determine the difference in optical depth between your ground glass and the surface of the plenum in the holder you select for modification. This will tell you how much you would have to "build out" the plenum depth to hold the film in the proper plane. Mylar shim stock is what I would recommend to do this in that it should be dimensionally stable. Keep in mind the 0.007" thickness of the filmstock (TMX/TMY) If you're using Tech Pan or something different, use that film's thickness as your basis for determining depth. To create the film holder, you might cut a piece of Mylar to a dimension of about 1/4" larger than 4x5 film and fold over about 1/8" along three edges. Trim the ends to create an easy to insert pocket for the film. Make certain you use a holder that is on the deep side of tolerance and build out with Mylar otherwise the 4x5 sheet will be too close to the lens. If you do this, let us know how you make out.

  9. #9

    Film Holder as Reducing Back

    Robert, thanks for understanding. As you can see from another thread, I spent $100 on film just test Xtol, and ended up with nothing, that is, no consistent development time. I wish I had spend $30 on 4x5 film instead.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 1999
    Posts
    100

    Film Holder as Reducing Back

    William - I gather from your comments that you're mainly interested in this for doing testing (development times, etc.). If so, a quick and dirty fix is simply to tape one (or two) pieces of 4x5 film directly onto the septum of an 8x10 holder, then fire away. I believe I first heard of this from Fred Picker's writings, but I'll bet it's been done for ages. I'd use small pieces of low-tack drafting tape in the corners. Obviously, you're not going to make any "real" photos this way, but it will reduce your cost for film testing by a factor of four.

    Cheers!

Similar Threads

  1. Toyo 810G, 4x5 reducing back, and Polaroid holder
    By David Young in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29-Nov-2005, 13:24
  2. Sinar 4x5 Back on Deardorff Reducing Back...
    By Capocheny in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 4-Nov-2005, 23:08
  3. 4x5 film holder/back dimensions
    By Whtny in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-Apr-2005, 08:09
  4. Interesting item: A reducing film holder
    By David R Munson in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 22-Mar-2005, 14:45
  5. Camera-back/film-holder interface lightproofing
    By Ron Hughes in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-Feb-1998, 12:07

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •