Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    78

    Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

    I think the term Large Format is a relative term here. How small is LF? Is a 6x9 view camera considered LF?

    How about 6x12 such as found in the Noblex Panoramic cameras? (Yes, I do have questions about the use of the Noblex. Where to ask such questions?)

    How can one travel with a Noblex camera that does not have a lens cover for protection? I am planning a trip to Tibet and was thinking of the awesome opportunities there. Dust, wind, cold, probably no tripod, any thoughts or recommendations??

  2. #2
    tim atherton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Posts
    3,697

    Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

    I guess the smaller sized formats tend to qualify when use din cameras with view camera movments.

    That said, ocassional list member Geoffrey James - known for his 8x10 work, uses Noblexes a lot now. He's commented to me more than once that with the 5x12 neg and the ultra sharp lens it feels much more like 4x5 when working with it and printing. He formerly used an old Kodak panning camera for his books on Italian Gardens and the Campagna Roman, as well as some of the Viewing Olmsted work I think and a recent book on Mount Royal Cemetary in Montreal was witht he Noblex (in colour).

    Here's a link to some of his work in Toronto:

    http://www.canadianarchitect.com/Issues/ISarticle.asp?id=151912&story_id=18776164159&issue=06012004&PC=&RType=

    or

    http://tinyurl.com/3bzlq

    I seem to recall they can be a bit temperemental and suffer from mechanical failure every now and then, which is why I think he has more than one body?
    You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn

    www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog

  3. #3

    Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

    Wow, Tibet. That sounds like a good time. I think you're gonna use a lot of zip-lock freezer bags. They're great for protection from dust or dampness.

    I'd also definitely take a second or third medium format camera. Don't know how reliable you can expect a Noblex to be, but things do happen, even with the best gear. (You've heard of Mr. Murphy, right?) And I'd guess that your chances of anything more than self-repair are about nil until you return.

    A table-top tripod is much better than none at all. You can brace it against a tree, a rock or your pack.

  4. #4
    Ted Harris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,465

    Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

    Kreig,



    I shoot mostly LF but seldom travel without my Noblex 150F.



    First, to respond to Tim's comments I do not find the camera to be the least bit finicky. You do have to be careful in using the proper sequence when starting a new roll or you will mess up the frame spacing. The lens is incredibly sharp and coupled with the variable focusing od the F model is wonderful. I have never used the model with shifts so can't comment. Before I settled on the Noblex I tried the Fuji G617 (I didn't like the coveragge as much as that from the swing lens) and the Seitz Roundshot (liked the coverage but just found it difficult and not intuitive to use). All I can say is that i wish I had a second body 'cause I sure csn run film through it fast. The camera can be a real money maker and I love the images.



    As for dust, etc. problems remember that the lens is covered when not in use. As for handholdingm the camera it is very difficult other than at the highest shutter speeds and even then you have another problem .... be very very careful not to get your fingers in the picture.



    I continue to have trouble uploading images here but please contact me offlist and I'll be glad to send you some.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,599

    Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

    krieg,

    I've never had a Noblex but I did have a Cyclops 612. FWIW for a panning lens camera I can't imagine not using a tripod. OTOH a panning lens can give you some really neat effects---distortions really. Not using a tripod with a panning lens tends to emphasize those effects. Check out Joseph Meehan's book "Panoramic Photography" published by Amphoto and you'll see what I mean. After seeing Richard Boulware's work with a Fuji fixed(not panning)lens employed as a handheld aerial camera I think that if my plans didn't include the availabiltity of a tripod I'd opt for a fixed lens panorama camera such as the Fuji or Linhof. Also(and I don't know if it holds true with Noblex, but sure was a concern with the Cyclops) consider the possibilities of vertical format "panoramas." I'd never know if Cyclops was going to shoot my shoes or if I'd get the top of the waterfall. I don't think that would be a problem with the viewfinder on the Fuji. My 2-cents.

    Hey, have a great trip!
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

    I've never found a ~ good ~ panoramic photo forum, so I would say sure, 6 x 12 plenty large enough to discuss here. I had a Noblex 612UX (with shift and slow speeds) for a few months and really liked it, but had to sell it at the time. I could hand-hold 400ASA film in good light - much slower and it was an iffy outcome. It really needs a tripod. I used the upward shift for almost every shot, landscapes and architecture. I too was afraid of dust and cleaning but it is a nicely built camera - but it's not as tough as knock-around, toss in the backpack camera. If I was hiking with it, I'd probably wrap it in a large plastic bag, with a foam padded "Domke" wrap. And then wrap a sweater around it.

    You can do long exposures by making multiple exposures. The maximum shutter speed is 2 seconds if you get the additional slow-speed module that screws into the base (comes with the UX, I think). Your 2-second exposure actually takes almost 45 seconds for the rotating lens to complete its "2-second" rotation (each segment gets a full 2-seconds.) This isn't a problem (except for your patience) in most cases (like interiors), but during sunset, when light is fading fast, your exposures can't be made fast enough to keep up with the fading light levels. For example, a 15-sec @ f/16 exposure might take 8 minutes to do - in which time you've lost another stop of light, requiring even more exposure time!

    Nick Meers, a UK photographer, has the best pano book I've seen, called "Stretch." You can find it at Amazon or at http://www.robertwhite.co.uk/books.htm#meers

    The Noblex and the other rotating cameras are in a different league from the fixed lens pan cameras like the Fuji or Linhof 6x17, or the Linhof and Horseman 6x12. These non-rotating cameras are very nice and reliable, but nowhere near the same viewing angle and unique look of images from the rotating cameras.

    There was a post a couple of weeks ago about some Chinese "knock-offs" of 6 x 17 Linhofs, not that I condone that sort of thing...

  7. #7
    tim atherton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Posts
    3,697

    Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

    First, on the handheld thing, I have a colleague who, as well as doing landscapes etc, uses one handheld quite a bit for street type photography. Works very well, with interesting results.

    As well, the more I look at it, the more I see there is a real difference between if you like "true" panoramics from a scanning lens camera, and those which are really just a crop from a larger negative with a WA lens (fuji 6x17, horseman 6x12, 8x20 etc). I think in part the scanning lens is much closer to our vision and how we use our eyes?

    Was just looking through my Sudek Panoramics books after reading the first post, taken with a Kodak pano I think (?) - quite amazing and often unique images (and wonderful vertical panoramics of trees). There are 150+ images. It's certainly one of the best books of this sort of work. (mind you, on the LoC site you can download some huge Cirkut type panos of beauty paegants from the 1920's - they are really neat!)

    I'm resisting the whole Noblex thing like crazy, because I already spend all my spare pennies on 8x10.... but our "big sky" country up here makes Montana look like a suburb - it would interesting to try one out.

    (PS on the "finicky" thing - I was going more by a few reports of mechanical failure under hard prolonged use - a couple of dozen negs a day etc - as well made as they are, there is just more to go wrong than on a Toyo 45A... maybe the reports were unusual though?)
    You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn

    www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    now in Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    3,618

    Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

    I don't know the Noblex cameras- but I did hear that they incorporate some design improvements over the 35mm Widelux, which is basically similar. The Widelux *is* a delicate camera, and if not handled with care, you'll see banding on your negatives- due to the lens not rotating smoothly during the long exposures. I've used two Wideluxes. One was borrowed, and showed the banding problem after awhile (no, I didn't abuse the camera). The other was rented from L&R and was fine. The Noblex looks like an improved design- my trouble is that I'm not seeing things that way these days.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

    I'm not a big fan, but McDuff Everton uses the Noblexes for many popular travel magazine illustrations. He has a big coffetable book out - "The Western Horizon" - which gives you a good idea of the capabilities.

    The 120 Noblexes are sturdier and better made than the 35mm versions, and lightyears ahead of the Russian Horizant and Panon Widelux. The electric motor (almost) eliminates any chance of banding, which is a common occurance with the mechanical cameras (which require regular adjustment.)

    I'd have no qualms about the sturdiness or quality of a 120 Noblex, so long as you buy it in good repair. The fixed lens cameras are always going to be more reliable, but they really give you nothing that you couldn't get from cropping a 4x5 with the same lens.

    </a>

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    628

    Is 6x12 considered LF? (Noblex?)

    I have a Widelux, and IMHO you can hand hold rotating lens cameras. Though whenever practicable I use a tripod with any camera.

    Beware that in the wide open spaces, like Tibet (say hi to my wife, she's there right now!), many images disappear off into the distance with such a wide angle as the Widelux. Sorry, I don't know the numerical size, nor how it compares with the size of the Noblex. But I have learned the counter-intuitive point that it works better for medium distance than long distance shots.

Similar Threads

  1. Noblex Large Format Shutter
    By DE Carney in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 9-Jun-2019, 22:29
  2. 7x17 vs 8x20 - all things considered
    By David R Munson in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 1-Jan-2011, 13:32
  3. Noblex 6x12 camera
    By bob carnie in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 31-Dec-2004, 07:27
  4. Is 2x2 film considered Large Format?
    By David Britton in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 15-Aug-2001, 17:09

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •