Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 7x17, shorter versus longer lenses, perspective

  1. #1

    7x17, shorter versus longer lenses, perspective

    I recently asked ULF shooters, and particularly in 717 format, which focal length lenses you preferred and for what types of subject matter.

    Sandy King commented that his favorites (in 717 format) were 240 and 300 Computars, 450 Nikkor M, and 600 Fujinon-C.

    Question for everyone: what do you like about the effect of getting longer and longer beyond the logical advantage of merely having increased reach? Do you particularly like the inherent optical tendencies such as less (wide angle) distortion, compression of space?

    What, specifically, does "wider" get at - optically for you (that so many seem to prefer and say is a "natural" for aspect ratios like 717/820/410)? What does "longer" get at optically for you?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    832

    7x17, shorter versus longer lenses, perspective

    What do you mean by "optically"? I suspect you really mean esthetically, because you can noodle out the optical metrics on paper.

  3. #3

    7x17, shorter versus longer lenses, perspective

    Yes, jj, thank you.

    I mean to ask, considering the optical "peculiarities" of each focal length, how does each of you exploit this esthetically. Put another way, I assume that each of you is not "neutral" in terms of the resultant effects upon esthetics of changes in focal length.

    For example, I love "wide." I love how the wideness seems to give greater context for presentation of the scene. I like how that wideness seems to give increased significance to the other elements within the composition.

  4. #4

    7x17, shorter versus longer lenses, perspective

    I think the peculiarities is really dependant on what you are shooting. When I first got into 7x17 I was after the big vista, and was on a search for wider and wider lenses. What I found as I shot more, is that more moderate wides (355mm), and yes even some slight long lenses (600) can still provide me with what I need. Often times a 270 was way wide enough.

    If you are unsure... take an old mat board and cut a 3.5x8.5 inch opening in it. Walk around and look at the world and see what catches your eye and how you will fill the inherently wide space that a 7x17 offers. Then 'estimate' the distance betweene your eye and the mat board, double it, and you have the focal length. You may be surprised by what you find...

    Steve

Similar Threads

  1. 7x17 lenses?
    By Daniel Grenier in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 17-Sep-2022, 18:00
  2. Nikon no longer producing lenses for LF or englarg
    By gfen in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-Jan-2006, 15:26
  3. Lenses Longer than 600mm/24" on 7x17
    By Kerry L. Thalmann in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 9-Nov-2005, 16:43
  4. Do you use your longer lenses much for landscapes
    By Matt Brain in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-Oct-2005, 17:44
  5. Portrait lenses rec. Perspective in 4x5
    By Wayne Crider in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 6-Nov-2001, 14:22

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •