Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: affordable 8x10 B&W film

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    affordable 8x10 B&W film

    What's the best deal on 8x10 B&W film right now? ISO 100-400, in date

  2. #2
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    affordable 8x10 B&W film

    J&C 400, if their order has come in yet. Efke PL100 is also a good deal.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,601

    affordable 8x10 B&W film

    Funny thing, I was on Wisner's site and he's selling Ultrafine made in England 400 speed film quite reasonably. HP-5+?? Who knows. The Ultrafine I've used was (and is sorely missed) Ilford FP-4 cut from end rolls by Photographers Warehouse in SoCal. I recall Ron's price was around $40/25 sheets but I could be wrong--however it would be a real savings over the $75/box most dealers are charging.

    The cheapest 8x10 film I know of is APHS ortho and Arista .eduUltra(Foma?) from Freestyle and J and C Pro which hails from China. J and C also have an attractive price right now for J and C Classic 400 in 50 sheet boxes, which I'd guess is Fortepan(?)

    Good luck!

    Quite a selection, eh?
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  4. #4
    windpointphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    262

    affordable 8x10 B&W film

    I have never understood the reason for looking for the lowest price 8x10 film. My Nikon FM cost less than the 4x5 and they cost considerably less than the 8x10, lenses and film holders. Why on earth cut corners with your film? TriX worked great in 35mm and 4x5 so why wouldn't I spend a few extra dollars and get the quality that I've experienced for years? If you like the cheaper film, or a brand that has lower costs go for it, but to go out of your way to save a little money just doesn't make sense to me. I guess that I'm one of those silly people who believes in one film, one developer and basically one paper. On the other hand I know what my print will look like when I make every exposure. No guessing. Penny wise, pound foolish.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    affordable 8x10 B&W film

    I agree Leonard but since I am just starting in 8x10, I thought try something other than Kodak if the quality is as good. I live in Rochester and I suspect that J&C and Efke might be around longer than Kodak Tri-X.

  6. #6
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    affordable 8x10 B&W film

    J&C 400 and Efke PL100 are actually pretty nice films, and indeed, one might prefer their tonality to the films made by the big manufacturers. They are more fragile, so they need to be handled more carefully, and they aren't as stable in storage, so you shouldn't stock up on them, but purchase fresh film as needed. In that sense, there is no free lunch, but visually they don't lack for anything.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    affordable 8x10 B&W film

    JandC Pro 100 is the cheapest 100-400 speed film, at $32/25 sheets. If you really want cheap, and don't mind slow, ortho film, try Freestyle's APHS film @ $16/25 sheets. I'm learning to love this stuff.

    Jay

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2

    affordable 8x10 B&W film

    How does the J&C pro 100 compare to FP4 from Ilford?

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    affordable 8x10 B&W film

    Hi HG.

    J and C Pro 100 is slower than FP4+, and has a much softer emulsion, which benefits from cooler processing temps and lower pH/ tanning developers. J and C Pro 100 has enormous expansion/contraction potential, but the machinery on which it's coated is antique, and defects are much more common than with FP4+.

    Jay

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,601

    affordable 8x10 B&W film

    Jay DeFehr,

    Thats interesting to know. I was under the impression (why I don't know) that Lucky is a joint Kodak investment in China and used Kodak coating machines.

    (I don't want to start an international incident!----theres enough of those going on already)

    Have you tried Fomapan 100? I'm wondering how it compares with J and C Pro quality wise. As soon as I finish off my meager supply of FP-4+, I am going to try Fomapan 100 (got a box right here!) but it will be awhile before I get to try J and C Pro in comparison. Do you have any observations or made any comparisons between the two?
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

Similar Threads

  1. "Affordable" 11x14 camera ?
    By Ken Lee in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 29-Jun-2005, 16:56
  2. affordable 4 x 5" enlargers
    By Lukas Werth in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 15-Dec-2003, 09:46
  3. Affordable Scanning of 4X5 nagatives
    By Lawrence Floyd, Jr. in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 15-Apr-2002, 13:54
  4. Affordable Digital LF - How long
    By Bill Smith in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14-Dec-2000, 23:04
  5. Possible coverage of Ekt. 127-affordable lenses
    By Joshua L. Slocum in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18-Jan-2000, 20:15

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •