In a follow up to my thread about limited editions and posters, here is another interesting example. Robert Turner sells his prints
in editions of 100, with a 16x20 going for $500.
Among them is the Pfeiffer cove. The Ansel Adams Gallery sells
that one for $175. It is also a 16x20, but it is said to be a "photographic reproduction of original work".
Does the fact of calling something an original and something a reproduction make it so, when both are lightjets ?
Your thoughts ?
PS: If there is something that I missed, my apologies in advance to all concerned.