Coverage of a CM FUJINON W f/5.6 105mm lens?

[Greg]

Anyone have some literature that lists the coverage of a CM FUJINON W f/5.6 105mm lens? My FUJI literature only lists the f/8 SW version. Am hoping that it would cover Whole Plate....
Thanks

[Oren Grad]

Spec is 174mm at f/22, recommended format is 4x5.

[Drew Wiley]

Rather scanty even for 4x5.

[Dan Fromm]

Its really a normal lens for 2x3.

If you're set on using a 105 on whole plate, you'll need a lens that covers at least 105 degrees. I don't think there are any 105s that cover that much, could be mistaken. You might want to browse manufacturers' catalogs. Use the list to find them.

[Leigh]

Its really a normal lens for 2x3.

As Oren said, the image circle of the 105 is 174mm.
The diagonal of 4x5 film is 163mm. That's corner-to-corner of the sheet. Image diagonal is slightly less.
Granted, that allows zero movements, and perhaps less than optimum definition in the corners, but it certainly covers 4x5 film.

- Leigh

[Oren Grad]

Its really a normal lens for 2x3.

This. Fuji pushed the coverage a bit, but the CM-W series are normal lenses, and the 100/105 normals are intended for 2x3/6x9.

[Neal Chaves]

I have the 105 5.6 Fujinon W. It is good only for 6X9cm with movements. I had the 120 f8 Fujinon SW. It just clipped the corners of an 8X10. It was sharp but in a funky Seiko shutter so now I have a 120 F8 Nikkor SW in a Copal. It too clips the corners on 8X10 but I don't mind. Here's an old store on Knotts Island NC. 810M Toyo Field camera.

[Drew Wiley]

In my brochure Fuji shows 6-1/2X8-1/2 in brackets for the 180 lens, meaning that 180 would be hypothetically usable, but marginally, well stopped-down without wiggle room. That makes sense. 105 is way too short unless you want a donut hole effect.

[Leigh]

In my brochure Fuji shows 6-1/2X8-1/2 in brackets for the 180 lens, meaning that 180 would be hypothetically usable, but marginally, well stopped-down without wiggle room.

Where did 180mm come from?

Your post is the only one in this thread that mentions that FL.

- Leigh

[Oslolens]

I have the 105 5.6 Fujinon W. It is good only for 6X9cm with movements. I had the 120 f8 Fujinon SW. It just clipped the corners of an 8X10. It was sharp but in a funky Seiko shutter so now I have a 120 F8 Nikkor SW in a Copal. It too clips the corners on 8X10 but I don't mind. Here's an old store on Knotts Island NC. 810M Toyo Field camera.

Could it be the Nikkor-SW don't clip the corners if you center the lens over the 8x10" film?

Sent fra min D6503 via Tapatalk