Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 85 of 85

Thread: Focal length vs. field of view?

  1. #81

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,566

    Re: Focal length vs. field of view?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Salomon View Post
    If your film format is rectangular then why use a square compendium?
    I would line this one:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	s-l1600.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	23.3 KB 
ID:	182751

    but regular ones are squared so you use it for both vertical and horizontal...

    Anyway an squared one usually works perfectly, as it can be used to shade well the sky and direct sunlight, then if the earth side is not well trimmed this is not a tragedy, because the lower brightness.

  2. #82

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    North Dakota
    Posts
    1,328

    Re: Focal length vs. field of view?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Salomon View Post
    I started using LF in 1962. I have used an old Ansco, Sinar 45 to 810 and Linhof when I had my studio. I have sold Sinar as a rep for EPOI and was Product Manager and Sales Manager for Linhof from 1979 to 2015 and for Wista from 1990 to 2015 and for Rodenstock from 1986 to 2015.

    In all that time, using, managing and selling LF your perceived problem never occurred. Not once!

    The use of proper material to make a bellows and the pleats in the bellows and the proper finish inside the camera makes this a folk tale!

    What is correct in your post is the image circle is of equal importance as fov and, if you use direct or indirect displacements, even more important!
    Bob, on this one I am speaking from experience. Some of the newer bellows are fairly shiny and almost polished. Using a 300mm Nikkor M on a 4x5 with new bellows(eBay) and I got the pleat pattern light reflection on the negative. Switched to a 360 Nikkor Tele and it went away. I was shooting Fuji Velvia and the odd reflections had me baffled. Checked with Fuji Tech folks in LA area and they helped me track it down. If I had not been on the West Coast and processed some film there on the trip I would probably still be wondering what the wierd pattern was.

    Shining bright flashlights into the lens with the back off I could see the reflections. More when the light was way off center than near the center of a composition.

    Have not run into it with the 8x10. But, that is an older camera with original bellows.
    ” Never attribute to inspiration that which can be adequately explained by delusion”.

  3. #83
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,454

    Re: Focal length vs. field of view?

    Quote Originally Posted by Willie View Post
    Using a 300mm Nikkor M on a 4x5 with new bellows(eBay)...
    Have not run into it with the 8x10. But, that is an older camera with original bellows.
    Willie,

    I'm amazed that you fail to understand the problem.

    It starts with 'e' and ends with 'y'.
    Use proper components and you won't have that problem.

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

  4. #84

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Focal length vs. field of view?

    Quote Originally Posted by Willie View Post
    Bob, on this one I am speaking from experience. Some of the newer bellows are fairly shiny and almost polished. Using a 300mm Nikkor M on a 4x5 with new bellows(eBay) and I got the pleat pattern light reflection on the negative. Switched to a 360 Nikkor Tele and it went away. I was shooting Fuji Velvia and the odd reflections had me baffled. Checked with Fuji Tech folks in LA area and they helped me track it down. If I had not been on the West Coast and processed some film there on the trip I would probably still be wondering what the wierd pattern was.

    Shining bright flashlights into the lens with the back off I could see the reflections. More when the light was way off center than near the center of a composition.

    Have not run into it with the 8x10. But, that is an older camera with original bellows.
    Willie, you get what you pay for, in this case, a cheaply made bellows!

  5. #85

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    North Dakota
    Posts
    1,328

    Re: Focal length vs. field of view?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Salomon View Post
    Willie, you get what you pay for, in this case, a cheaply made bellows!
    You are right about that one, Bob. Bought the 4x5 at auction and it had the bellows on it. I prefer Custom Bellows in the UK. They do a nice job.
    ” Never attribute to inspiration that which can be adequately explained by delusion”.

Similar Threads

  1. Super Angulon 90mm f/8 - focal length/angle of view using only front element?
    By jameswangphoto in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 5-Jan-2015, 17:16
  2. Focal Length and Angle of View when closer than infinity
    By Ken Lee in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-Mar-2013, 11:00
  3. Focal length / depth of field question
    By rich caramadre in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 9-Feb-2013, 06:28
  4. Zoom lens focal length and back focal length relation
    By raghavsol in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 16-Mar-2011, 03:00
  5. Ultrawides: Focal Length vs Angle of View
    By David Cerbone in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 3-Mar-2009, 07:12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •