Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Supposed Jesse James tintype

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    4,431

    Supposed Jesse James tintype

    http://www.foxnews.com/science/2018/...2-million.html

    Trying to match a found tintype to a famous person seems to be a current "jackpot" trend. I'm skeptical of most of them. I could buy 10 or 20 tintypes, then play "match the person" easily if all they go by is how the person looks. They put way to much credibility of "forensics" that just match up the facial dimentions of two photos. If you tried to match a tintype face to dozens of different people, you'd get matches. It's not that good a science yet.

    We all see people on the street or in airports that look surprisingly like someone we know, but is not. There are only so many face types in the world. The buyer's, "He noticed a marked similarity between the youth in the picture and a photo of James in a book." is very...very thin.

    Where is the provenance? Where was the photo shot? When? What town? Who owned it? No provenance at all but "gosh, he looks like...Jesse James!" ?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    now in Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    3,617

    Re: Supposed Jesse James tintype

    This 'find' has already been effectively debunked on the photo-history forum. Didn't take long.
    I thought I saw Billy the Kid in the background!

  3. #3
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Neverland Blues again...
    Posts
    6,268

    Re: Supposed Jesse James tintype

    On the other hand, Will Dunniway, who authenticated it, posted on his Facebook page that, compared to another authenticated image of Jesse James that came from the James family, the newly-discovered tintype was taken by the same photographer on the same day...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Jesse.jpg  
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    now in Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    3,617

    Re: Supposed Jesse James tintype

    Well, what do I know? Only enough to look into who's paying the 'experts'. As the philosopher sais about Christianity, "Astounding, if true."

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    12

    Re: Supposed Jesse James tintype

    No serious Jesse James student takes this tintype seriously. Every month or so some starry-eyed bozo finds a photo at a flea market; announces it's Billy the Kid, Butch Cassidy, Peter Pan, whomever; finds a doofus, self-described expert; and declares a multi-million dollar value. The news soon hits the media, where such stories are known cynically as "too-good-to-check," and spins around the world for a day or two, before drifting into obscurity.

    Exactly what evidence is there that both photographs were taken the same day by the same photographer? None. The same photographer same day assertion was made by one of the so-called experts. Evidence? None. The differences between the two photos are multitudinous. Look at the two images. Two different people wearing different clothing. The jacket lapels are different. The white shirts are different -- -- lad on left, collar tight; lad on right collar loose because the shirt was too big. Shirt & neck -- lad on left shirt high on neck; lad on right shirt low on neck. In fact, lad on right looks like Ichabod Crane. Shoulders -- lad on left shoulders seriously higher than lad on right. Ears -- lad on left ears lower on head than lad on right. Hair -- note difference in hair line on forehead, including widow's peak on left, vs. no widow's peak on right. Cravat-- same style dark cravat, but arranged differently on each lad.

    When people look at two photos, especially when they've been prompted to think they are the same person, the eye (meaning the brain) naturally looks for similarities. The key is to look for differences. Finally, and just as importantly, there is absolutely no provenance linking the eBay tintype (photo on left) to Jesse James.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Hamilton, Canada
    Posts
    1,881

    Re: Supposed Jesse James tintype

    Interesting responses.
    Mark, as to funding, It is fair to be suspicious of where the funding comes from, but on the other hand who else will pay but an interested party?
    DBuck; Welcome to the large format forum. Would you be Daniel Buck of the WWHA? If so you are more schooled in the time period than I ( if not you are still more likely to know a lot more of the period than I anyway) but I do pose portraits and collect portraits older than 1950 and as to the photographic differences, I thought it might be fun to consider them photographically.
    Jacket lapels. Left lad seems to be wearing two coats; you can see the edges on his (photo) right side. Is one an overcoat and the other the coat on right lad? It was quite common to have portraits done with the overcoat on, in the time period.
    Shirt neck and collar. Looks like left lad is looking down and has his chin tucked in. Right lad is looking to the right and has a slight tilt to the right exposing more neck. This will effect the appearance of tightness and position of collar. The button detail looks common.
    Shoulders. left lad has two coats on adding extra thickness to his shoulders, building up the shoulders. Suit jackets by themselves were designed in this time period to have sloping shoulders, which was considered stylish.
    Ears. Again affected by chin up and tilt of right lad.
    Hair. Pass a hand through your hair and the front wave will shift.
    Cravat. I have worn a bow tie all my life which is a simple square knot like the ties of this style. a simple tug on the ends will expose more of the knot between the first and second throw, which is arranged to travel straight down.
    Provenance is convincing and simpler and wonderful but that does not mean that found images (or any artifact lacking provenance) should not be researched rather than rejected out of hand. It is possible to identify found images. I have had a Rogi Andre portrait of 1937 on my wall for 30 years and just recently identified the sitter, Dikran Garabed Kelekian.
    Any way I don't have a dog in the fight. Thanks for joining. I always like to discuss older portraits.
    Kindest Regards
    Bill

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    12

    Re: Supposed Jesse James tintype

    Bill,
    My comments were in reaction to Will Dunniway, one of the two "experts" who concluded the eBay tintype was Jesse James. (The other expert, Kent Gibson has misidentified a slew of historic photos, most recently Amelia Earhart.) Dunniway said that the eBay JJ was identical to another supposed JJ photo, taken he said by the same photographer on the same day: "When it is compared to the much used comparison image I believe it was taken on the same day by the same photographer. It is very evident by the face, hair cut, jacket, shirt and tie that this is the same image of Jesse James at 14 years old." See, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ay-told-could/

    Dunniway says the images show the same "face, hair cut, jacket, shirt, and tie." But they are not the same. That's my point. If he had said there are several differences between the two photos, but he still thought they depicted the same person, that would be at least a more reasonable opinion. But he did not. Dunniway also has zero basis for saying the two images were taken the same day by the same photographer. He's blowing smoke. He has no idea who took either image or where. Based on that the eBay tintype is worth millions?

    Some differences can be explained, but others cannot. The ears on the eBay tintype lad are higher on his head than the other supposed JJ in the other photo. Hard to get around that.

    The complete lack of provenance for the eBay JJ is not fatal, but it's a serious problem because here are many look alikes out there. If you spend enough time trawling flea market bins you'll find images of anonymous people who look vaguely like famous people. (Google Alec Balwin & Millard Fillmore -- they are twins.) Ebay sellers often use the tickler phrase "I've been told this looks like . . . . You be the judge."

    Ever since the one authentic Billy the Kid tintype sold for $2.3 million a few years ago, "flea market Billies" as they are now generically called, have been falling from the skies. The eBay JJ is one of them.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,409

    Re: Supposed Jesse James tintype

    Amazing, the one on the left looks just like Jared Kushner!

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    12

    Re: Supposed Jesse James tintype

    CORRECTION: the published JJ image (on the right in the above post, was supposedly taken in Kansas City). There is no evidence as to where the eBay JJ was taken. Dan

  10. #10
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,736

    Re: Supposed Jesse James tintype

    Who buys it for $2,000,000 when you hit the Jackpot? Is it documented anywhere? Reminds me of the guy that found "millions of dollars" worth of "Ansel Adams" plates....I wonder if they are taking up space in his garage right now.

Similar Threads

  1. Is Steinheil Unifocal lens supposed to be soft focus?
    By Bill_1856 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18-Aug-2014, 17:06
  2. Tintype help
    By Randy in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 20-Jul-2013, 22:04
  3. Fuji PA-45 holder: darkslide supposed to be loose?
    By Nicolai Morrisson in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 24-Sep-2008, 10:14
  4. Tintype
    By Tintype Bob in forum On Photography
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 30-Jul-2008, 10:17

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •