Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: 6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

  1. #1

    6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

    Who has a 6.5 x 8.5 field camera? I have one, an Scovill Albion Field camera (1880's-90's) with its original Rochester Victor lens- which I have restored and use on occasion---however, I have had to make the following adjustments/alterations. 1. Since film of this size (Ilford) is a rarity & costly, I have resorted to using 5x7 film inserts (Rochester) in the original film holders---hence my negatives are 5x7 Ilford film. 2. Since Scovill 6.5 x 8.5 film holders are also a very rare commodity, (I have yet to see any on Ebay), I have had to resort to using Rochester 6.5 x 8.5 film holders which a woodsmith has had to slightly alter to accommodate the Scovill camera---There are some issues holding the Rochester film holders in place against the Scovill camera--some issues with the camera set at horizontal or vertical, however, I have managed to circumvent these minor issues.

    I am still in the testing stages regarding the original lens---to use or not. I only have 2 Rochester film holders (4 sheets of film total), so testing is a long process.

    As an alternative, I have made a lens board, and could use another lens besides the Rochester Victor lens--a modern Ilex 152mm which has produced good negatives on a 4x5 camera. I have as yet not determined which way to go regarding lenses, but since I only have 4 sheets of film, perhaps I should be using a trusted modern lens as compared to the Victor lens itself. Your thoughts?

    So who is using this sized film camera/s? and your situation.

    Raymond

  2. #2

    Re: 6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

    Bought a japanese whole plate camera that came with 3 backs. Richard Ritter made me a back that works with the Chamonix holders and I bought FP4 during the Ilford special order for film. Actually quite a simple process!
    Best, Peter

  3. #3
    Dave Karp
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    2,960

    Re: 6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

    I have a WP Improved Seneca. Years ago, Jim from Western Bellows made a new bellows for it. I have a variety of holders that are built to the Eastman "standard." I too purchase WP film during the Ilford special order period. I also own an ARCA Swiss monorail. I had a WP back built for it and Custom Bellows made a bellows that reduces to the ARCA 171 front standard. This one camera with three different back/bellows combinations gives me a 4x5, a 5x7, and a WP camera.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: 6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

    I've had several, but what I kept was a whole bunch of film holders, 19 last count, and I have 2 backs that size, one fits my venerable Kodak 2D 8X10 and one fits the Century Studio #10 upstairs.

    What I like about the size is that I have some rolls of aerial recon Panatomic X that I love, and when I cut that off the long roll, if I make 8X10 there's more wasted than if I cut it at 6.5 and then make a little cut to get me to the 8.5 Been shooting a lot of it lately. 6.5X8.5 is an elegant size for contact prints.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails img336s.jpg   img348s.jpg   img341s.jpg  

  5. #5
    ghostcount's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Condado de la Naranja, CA
    Posts
    669

    Re: 6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

    Toyo field half plate camera with a whole plate extension back and Toyo whole plate film holders. Ilford whole plate film (HP5) is a bit on the long side so I have some issues with the Toyo whole plate film holders.
    "Sex is like maths, add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the whoo hoo and hope you don't multiply." - Leather jacket guy

  6. #6
    Dave Karp
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    2,960

    Re: 6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Galli View Post
    I've had several, . . .
    My Seneca was one of them! :-)

    Thanks Jim! I really like the WP format. I agree, the size makes for a nice contact print.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: 6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

    Quote Originally Posted by David Karp View Post
    My Seneca was one of them! :-)

    Thanks Jim! I really like the WP format. I agree, the size makes for a nice contact print.
    I couldn't remember if the black beauty was full plate or 5X7 :~'))

  8. #8
    Dave Karp
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    2,960

    Re: 6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

    You later sold me a 5x7 back for it too!

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    713

    Re: 6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

    Whole Plate Gandolfi Universal here (and a 275mm Eidoscope on the way.) 6 holders. 2 Kodak GB holders, which are very nice and 4 scruffy Eastman holders. I have a couple boxes of 400TMY 6 1/2 x 8 1/2, but I see myself cutting down 8x10 film in future.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,816

    Re: 6.5 x 8.5 cameras/negatives---who has???

    I have two WP cameras, one of them is an Ebony one bought here and the other is a Chamonix. A few hundred sheets of expired film. Love this format for portrait with a Lanthar 30cm lens. Put the print on an 11x14 mat, just lovely to look at in your hands.

Similar Threads

  1. Luxurious Cameras vs. Plain Jane Cameras and your Camera of Choice!
    By audioexcels in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 86
    Last Post: 29-Feb-2012, 23:12
  2. Cameras with front swing vs. cameras without it...how important?
    By audioexcels in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 19-Aug-2007, 07:55

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •