I use two: 450mm and 150mm. The latter for close-up work.
I use two: 450mm and 150mm. The latter for close-up work.
Leigh is right, of course. And it is also possible to use an extension lensboard or a telephoto design.
But a glance at the Chamonix website showed that the 8x10 has a maximum bellows extension of 680mm. Ignoring the various offsets and mounting options, a 1:1 image (about as tight a headshot as I would ever want!) will dictate a 340 mm lens (and focusing will be a lot of fun, both because of the shallow depth of field and the fact that at 1:1 you have to move the camera, not just the lens...)
I went through this exact exercise some years back when I acquired an 8x10 Cambo Legend. I already owned a 360 at the time, and naively thought that a 480 would give me both a larger image and better perspective.
For really tight headshots contact-printed from 8x10 negatives, it is probably going to be hard to beat an 11x14 camera with a reducing back.
You only *need* new equipment if you can't do what you need to get done using your existing equipment. Note that *need* is not the same thing as *want*.
So... are there pictures you can't make because you don't have a different lens? No? Then you don't need another lens.
Bruce Watson
Come and see what I have done up and until now at www.neilsphotography.co.uk
Come and see what I have done up and until now at www.neilsphotography.co.uk
Has anyone tried the Nikor 600mm T ED lens on a 8x10............I'm not even sure if its a 8x10 lens but there are a few for sale on eBay for around a grand..........theirs also a bunch of old brass lenses on ebay (Soft Focus lenses) that look very old and are really expensive
Neil
Come and see what I have done up and until now at www.neilsphotography.co.uk
The Fujinon C 600mm only needs 573mm of extension with an IC of 620mm. Their 450mm lenses offer ICs from 490-520mm with flange focal lengths from 425-445mm. There are many other similar lenses, so plenty to choose from with a 680mm bellows. But if you REALLY want to get close, a shorter lens might fill the bill -- even one designed for 4x5 at infinity that does not cover 8x10 at infinity.
Come and see what I have done up and until now at www.neilsphotography.co.uk
Bookmarks