Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: UV content of lights for wet plate collodion-based processes.

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Licking County, Ohio
    Posts
    157

    UV content of lights for wet plate collodion-based processes.

    I'm being seduced by ambrotypes but being able to use artificial light is a deal-breaker for me. I have old sledge hammer packs with enough joules in them to get me into the energy range people talk about for use with collodion. However, a couple of the heads need new tubes and the used market only has the UV-coated ones that are used in the fashion industry to prevent the dyes and brighteners in fabric from fluorescing. How much of a difference does it make to collodion using a strobe with a clear-glass tube vs one with anti-UV coating? I can't imagine that the uncoated tubes actually emit that much light or there would be warnings about using them without UV protection for your eyes. Beyond that, I don't know if collodion is primarily UV-sensitive or primarily blue-sensitive with a bit of response down into the UV (all I know is that it's red-blind).

    So, those of you who actually do collodion-based processes, do you have any idea if clear-glass vs UV-coated strobe tubes is a deal breaker?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    19

    Re: UV content of lights for wet plate collodion-based processes.

    Contribution of UV portion to WPC exposure is negligible with common lenses.

    "Well, some say combination of UV-rich light and vintage (uncoated) lens is fastest, but i would really doubt the UV transmittance of any glass. Looking at salted collodion spectral sensitivity, it starts at 500+nm, peaks at 450nm/420nm (bromide/iodide) and extends to UV.

    But wikipedia says : "Most types of glass will allow longwave UV to pass, but absorb all the other UV wavelengths, usually from about 350 nm and below. For UV photography it is necessary to use specially developed lenses having elements made from fused quartz or quartz and fluorite."

    So you still have only ~50nm of near-UV portion usable for exposure with common lenses and not this is not even in most sensitive region. "

  3. #3

    Re: UV content of lights for wet plate collodion-based processes.

    I have used both (Speedotron) UV-coated and bare bulbs with wet plate and other color-blind processes and never noticed a difference in speed. So, I wouldn't worry about it.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19-Feb-2013, 02:31
  2. Plate burner for alternate processes
    By jon.oman in forum Gear
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 19-Dec-2008, 15:19
  3. Iron Based Processes or 'Poor Man's' Alt-Process
    By tpersin in forum Announcements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-May-2008, 11:21

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •