Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: SP-445 C-41 experiences?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    39

    SP-445 C-41 experiences?

    I was wondering how people have been getting on with their SP-445, using C-41?

    I read for example that, to get a full drainage of b/w chemicals, some users suggest to drain the tank as normal, then put it back upright and drain it once more, to avoid any liquid getting stuck inside the top (although I'm not sure where)... which I imagine could create problems with the short C-41 developing time. Unless you work at a lower temperature for example?

    Apart from this, on paper the system looks ideal for C-41. So I was surprised that there doesn't seem to be a thread about this already - at least I didn't find one!

    It would be great to get users' experiences and tips, using the SP-445 for C-41, even down to details like agitation rhythms and for example adapted development timings - or anything else you might feel worth mentioning, after using the SP-445 for C-41!

  2. #2
    chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,974

    Re: SP-445 C-41 experiences?

    I'm also interested to read comments about this. I want to know how people are securing the tank in a tempering bath, and as noted above, how pouring and draining are managed. I haven't found much written on C-41 with SP-445, yet.

  3. #3
    Nodda Duma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Batesville, Arkansas
    Posts
    1,116

    Re: SP-445 C-41 experiences?

    I'll be using my recently acquired SP-445 for C-41 soon. I'll update to let you know how it goes (if I remember to).

    I've successfully used it for E-6, which is similarly controlled like C-41. I sacrificed two sheets to test out my process, and didn't have any major issues.

    I have a stainless steel deep dish food serving pan that I use for temperature bath. I also have a cheap PID controller, circulating pump, and coffee cup heater for maintaining temp. This bath setup was originally acquired for making emulsion for dry plate, but I use it for all my temperature controlling needs. The setup works just fine. Didn't have any issues setting the tank in the water (which only goes halfway up the tank).

    I do find after pouring that if I re-tip the tank I can get the little last bit of the chemicals out. Only takes a couple seconds to do this.


    Don't be gentle with your agitation.
    Newly made large format dry plates available! Look:
    https://www.pictoriographica.com

  4. #4
    chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,974

    Re: SP-445 C-41 experiences?

    Nodda how are you securing the tank in the tempering bath? Seems to me the SP-445 tank might float or wobble/tip over.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    73

    Re: SP-445 C-41 experiences?

    Quote Originally Posted by chassis View Post
    Nodda how are you securing the tank in the tempering bath? Seems to me the SP-445 tank might float or wobble/tip over.
    I just hold it in the bath.

  6. #6
    Nodda Duma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Batesville, Arkansas
    Posts
    1,116

    SP-445 C-41 experiences?

    Quote Originally Posted by chassis View Post
    Nodda how are you securing the tank in the tempering bath? Seems to me the SP-445 tank might float or wobble/tip over.
    Water level reaches halfway up the tank, so it sits just fine without wobbling. The water pump provides very gentle circulation. I did some water temp testing to ensure it would be OK for the development periods.

    The chemical bottles sit on their side in the water and float around to maintain temp.

    I'll take a pic and post it next time I develop some film.
    Newly made large format dry plates available! Look:
    https://www.pictoriographica.com

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    39

    Re: SP-445 C-41 experiences?

    So I just did some b/w testing of the SP-445, with C-41 in mind...

    Filling in developer takes me about 5 seconds. Initially it took me nearly another 10 s before I had removed the funnel, had both lids screwed in and started agitating - but I'm pretty confident that with some practice and organisation I can get filling and closing lids down to 10s before I can start agitating - so that's not too far off from what I manage with a Paterson tank.

    Emptying the tank is a slightly different story: it takes me about 5s to initially drain the tank by tipping it on it's short side - but that leaves about 5ml of developer in the tank. To get the rest more or less out, I need to put the tank upright and turn over again, so I'm not ready to start getting in the next solution until about 15s after I started draining. That's a fair bit longer than what I manage with a Paterson tank. I'm not sure though if it's enough to make a difference, and could cause uneven development?

    So I currently see three C-41 options to try:
    - Use a lower temp than 37.8 degree Celsius (maybe 30?), which should make the pouring times less critical. Digibase chemicals for example do give timings for that, but this is not something I've done before. It should put times nearer to say the E-6 world. I'm somewhat concerened about what it would do to the colours but since I currently scan the negatives anyway, maybe it's not as big an issue as I imagine.
    - live with the extended pouring times at 37.8 degree, and hope it won't affect evenness.
    - live with the 5 ml carry-over, use a stop bath and replace that every couple of runs. I think that is what I might try this first.

    It would still be great to hear other people's experiences with the SP-445 and C-41!

  8. #8
    chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,974

    Re: SP-445 C-41 experiences?

    After developer, I use a stop bath, followed by a rinse bath. All at 100 deg F. 5ml residual developer will have no effect on results, assuming you dump the stop bath (use it one shot). I use vigorous agitation with the stop bath.

    Seems like you have a reasonable basis for a C-41 workflow. Your proposed 5s pouring time is reasonable.

    Do some reading on the former APUG site, now called Photrio. There is a ton of good C-41 discussion there.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    39

    Re: SP-445 C-41 experiences?

    Just thought I should post an update in case someone else comes across this thread with a similar question...

    So I tried my first three batches using the SP-445 for C-41 processing, and did so at 100 deg F / 37.8 deg C, and the results so far look fine.

    I get somewhat more carry-over of liquids, than e.g. with a Paterson tank doing 120, so that needed to be managed.

    In my case that involved using an acetic acid stop bath after developing, as a one-shot, freshly mixed for each batch, to reduce the risk of too much developer carrying into the bleach (which I re-use).

    To speed up filling, I am trying to have the right amount of volume for each bath pre-measured in the bottles - and these need checking after a few batches, again because of carry-over I think.

    It feels to me that, if you use the recommended slight squeeze to air-seal the tank, the recommended 485ml seems slightly too much - it can cause slight over-spill if you need to hurry. So will try this with 450ml next - and guess it depends on how much you squeeze the tank of course, so YMMV.

    I now manage ca 15 seconds between starting to pour out the developer and having the following stop bath fully filled. That's still somewhat slower than I manage with a Paterson, but judging by what I've seen on the negatives so far I have not noticed any unevenness due to that.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Suwanee, GA
    Posts
    1,078

    Re: SP-445 C-41 experiences?

    Tip - instead of using bottles and funnel, use 4cup measuring cups with 475ml of chems (is about 2 cups). I found the plastic ones with the pointed spout let me input to the tank faster and no funnel needed. When you dump back into the measuring cups you can see how much the volume changed (if any). Even with black and white I average 20-25 seconds of developer dump and stop fill.
    The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
    http://www.searing.photography

Similar Threads

  1. Any experiences using dry plates?
    By yuwenlong126 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 4-Sep-2010, 17:28
  2. Advertising experiences
    By matt naughton in forum Business
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 6-Nov-2007, 06:02
  3. Experiences with Dixactol
    By darter in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 15-Jan-2002, 16:29
  4. Experiences with the Phillips 4x5
    By David Payumo in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-Dec-2001, 00:47

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •