Any guess about what the focal length he used for this particular shot?
(beyond lightning importance) What would happened with volumes with a longer or shorter focal?
I find this shot amazing... (not the single one)
Any guess about what the focal length he used for this particular shot?
(beyond lightning importance) What would happened with volumes with a longer or shorter focal?
I find this shot amazing... (not the single one)
Karsh used Ektar lenses up to 14". He nearly always used 8x10 cameras.
I'll go with the 14" Commercial Ektar as well.
"I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White
With the 14" lens on 8x10, to get the head/shoulders framing, the camera to subject distance would be a bit close, correct? Or could the image be a crop out of the full negative?
The perspective looks close to my eye, meaning I am not seeing any flattening. Therefore it seems like a fairly short camera to sitter distance.
Probably whatever he happened to have with him!
Thanks for the information, I'm preparing for 8x10 portraiture (dry plate) and this particular image is a good aesthetical reference for me.
There was something that I was not understanding from this shot, and it was perpective, this is where the focal distance plays a role. Now I feel that 14" perspective has an slight geometric footprint, but I feel it is very important.
My old Symmar 360 will see some action !
If YK liked the 14".... it should be the way to start !
It also might have been shot with Ortho film--often used back then for portraits of men.
Here's the whole image.
In this version, Bogie's head is about a third of the 10 inch dimension. With a 14 inch lens, that would have placed the camera at about 5-6 ft.
Rich
Bookmarks