Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    65

    Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

    Let's preface this by letting you all know (which you'll soon figure out) that I'm terrible with numbers.

    I've been loosely trying to figure this out for a while, but thought I would ask on here, as I've had good luck before. Now, let's see if I can explain this properly...

    I'm wanting to shoot one of my lenses in the F2.5- F/4 range on bright days (summer is actually here, apparently). Normally, this isn't my bag, but I'd like to give it a shot.

    The problem I have (being pretty inexperienced with all the calculations...and math in general... and LF... and...) is figuring out how to compensate with my filters with the limited shutter speeds of my lenses (highest being 1/1000 on my speed graphic , and lowest being 1/400 on my Rodenstock).

    I tried to experiment on my digital camera, but reducing the shutter speed according to full stop increments left things under-exposed. I'm sure I'm doing something wrong.

    Ok, I guess my question is this (if you've made it this far)...

    Example:

    -Meter reads at 1/4000 at F/2.5

    -I want to keep the aperture at F/2.5 (Don't judge me)

    -My highest available shutter speed is 1/1000

    -I have a 10stop filter and a 6 stop filter available to me

    -What the heck do I do?


    Did that even make sense?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    173

    Re: Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

    6 stop ND filter, your shutter speed is 1/60 @ f2.5
    4000-2000 1 stop
    2000-1000 2 stops
    1000-500 3 stops
    500-250 4 stops
    250-125 5 stops
    125-60 6 stops
    And you are good to go.

  3. #3
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,052

    Re: Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

    Quote Originally Posted by seandavid View Post
    Example:
    -Meter reads at 1/4000 at F/2.5
    -I want to keep the aperture at F/2.5 (Don't judge me)
    -My highest available shutter speed is 1/1000
    -I have a 10stop filter and a 6 stop filter available to me
    -What the heck do I do?
    One stop equals a change in shutter speed by a factor of 2.
    So going from 1/4000 to 1/2000 is 1 stop; from 1/2000 to 1/1000 is another stop for a total of 2 stops.

    You need a 2-stop ND filter.

    To use your 6-stop ND filter you must drop 4 more stops, thus:
    1/1000->1/500, 1/500->1/250, 1/250->1/125, 1/125->1/60

    So shooting 1/60 @ f/2.5 should work provided the metered light level is the same.

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    65

    Re: Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

    Thanks, guys.

    I did some tests, and I guess my filters are not exactly what they say. The 6 stop is a 7 stop, and the 10 stop is a 10 and 1/3 stop.

    Thanks again!

  5. #5
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,052

    Re: Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

    Quote Originally Posted by seandavid View Post
    I did some tests, and I guess my filters are not exactly what they say. The 6 stop is a 7 stop, and the 10 stop is a 10 and 1/3 stop.
    Unless you have some really good optical test equipment, I suggest using the manufacturers' specs.

    Very few filters or films are flat across the visible spectrum.
    They tried to tailor the density based on the response characteristics of film.

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sheridan, Colorado
    Posts
    939

    Re: Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

    Just a couple of questions:

    1. How are your ND filters marked, ex. ND6X, 3.0ND, 0.9, or ?

    2. How did you determine their "actual" transmission? Was it with a camera meter or hand-held meter?

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    65

    Re: Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

    Quote Originally Posted by xkaes View Post
    Just a couple of questions:

    1. How are your ND filters marked, ex. ND6X, 3.0ND, 0.9, or ?

    2. How did you determine their "actual" transmission? Was it with a camera meter or hand-held meter?
    They just say 10 stop and 6 stop on them (respectively). They're from a company called Breakthrough Photography https://breakthrough.photography/pro...nt=30850759697

    My test sure wasn't scientific. I used my digital camera. I just metered a scene... meter read 1/1000 at F/4. Took a shot without the filter, Then threw on the 6 stop filter and reduced the exposure by 6 stops. It was dark. I then reduced it until the exposure (here's where it gets real, ummm "scientific") visually looked the same as the shot without the filter (which was a 7 stop reduction).

  8. #8
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,052

    Re: Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

    Quote Originally Posted by seandavid View Post
    I used my digital camera. I just metered a scene...
    Digital cameras are less than worthless for objective analysis. They're deceptive and manipulative.

    They take a meter reading, then manipulate it to achieve the "best" appearance assuming a human subject.

    Absolutely invalid for any reliable testing since they don't tell you what the algorithm is.

    Get a hand-held exposure meter, preferably of the vintage variety though it really doesn't matter.
    Use a sunlit white wall as the subject, standing where your shadow is not in the metered area.
    Meter the wall without the filter, then with.

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    65

    Re: Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

    Quote Originally Posted by Leigh View Post
    Digital cameras are less than worthless for objective analysis. They're deceptive and manipulative.

    They take a meter reading, then manipulate it to achieve the "best" appearance assuming a human subject.

    Absolutely invalid for any reliable testing since they don't tell you what the algorithm is.

    Get a hand-held exposure meter, preferably of the vintage variety though it really doesn't matter.
    Use a sunlit white wall as the subject, standing where your shadow is not in the metered area.
    Meter the wall without the filter, then with.

    - Leigh

    I agree 100% re. digital cameras. I just don't want to experiment with actual film.

    I am using a dedicated light meter. Always. Just taking the reading off of that and adjusting the settings on my camera.

    I'll definitely try the method you described.

    Thanks for your help and input!

  10. #10
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,052

    Re: Filters and Large(r) Apertures... Help

    Quote Originally Posted by seandavid View Post
    I agree 100% re. digital cameras. I just don't want to experiment with actual film.
    The problem with digital cameras is they don't always give you the same information.

    Film always responds the same way to the same conditions.

    Admittedly, testing with film costs money, which is why I suggested a hand-held exposure meter.

    - Leigh
    Last edited by Leigh; 22-Jun-2017 at 09:52.
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

Similar Threads

  1. Lee Filters and Large Lenses
    By Cletus in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 27-Aug-2012, 11:09
  2. Very Large VC Filters
    By Fragomeni in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 9-Feb-2012, 07:47
  3. filters for large lenses?
    By Jon Paul in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 14-Jun-2010, 20:43
  4. Is vignetting more likely at large or small apertures?
    By Yaakov Asher Sinclair in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 7-Dec-1999, 08:24

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •