Everyhone posting in this thread have contributed valid viewpoints and presented them with a well meaning intent. I appreciate that.
A forum member wrote this to me in a private message.
"At the end of the day we need to be respectful (of each other) because we are collectively in this game together. As photographers we need to unite on the craft and art."
and I agree with him.
On re-reading this thread, I think there is a misunderstanding. Many posts here suggest alternatives to Federal Wilderness Areas for persons with physical limitations; all of them wonderful places and the suggestions reasonable. A few contributers do seem a little annoyed that someone would want to force the broad issue of bringing wheels into the wilderness.
What is missed is that I am not advocating for wheelchair accessible pathways in the wilderness areas. However, it IS my position that a physically limited person should not be fined for trying to use an assistive device to get as far away from the car as is possible, given the terrain as it exists in nature. . . .just because it has wheels.
As Michael K. has pointed out, this thread is somewhat off topic. I agree. This forum is not the place to effect a change in federal policy. After all . . .t is just a rule, and it can be changed.
Bookmarks