Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: roll film holders & sheet film in backpack

  1. #1

    roll film holders & sheet film in backpack

    our of curiosity, are many of you carrying both roll film and sheet film when tr ekking with your pack. being somewhat of a "animal", i carry both, but i wonder if it is necessary at times( 2 6x7's and one 6x9, 7 bw sheet film holders and i 'm adding another 6 sheet holders for color) i have 4 lenses ranging from 65 to 210 and all the other stuff---your comments????

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Posts
    25

    roll film holders & sheet film in backpack

    No, don't do it! Everything you can capture on 6x7 or 6x9 you can capture on 4x5 and more. The only reason to use rollfilm on a 4x5 format camera is the cost of the film and the cost of losing valuable lens coverage power that you dearly paid for. As for trekking, do your best to minimalise. I know it is hard for addicts of fine paraphanalia like us but, recently I got stuck in S.France with so much photo gear, I was so enthousiastic about seeing landscape again after so long in the city, that I took two cameras, a rollfilm and a 4x5 that I wanted to play with. I ended up on my knees whimpering about 5 meters from the car. I was there for a week and only shot eight 4x5's, six and a half of which I screwed up and no rollfilm. Nothing to write home about but I thought I'd put it down here. So my advice is to travel as light as intellectualy possible and if film economy is an issue, one rollfilm holder is enough or go medium format.

  3. #3
    Robert A. Zeichner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Southfield, Michigan
    Posts
    1,129

    roll film holders & sheet film in backpack

    Another important thing to consider is the film plane to ground glass plane relationship with roll film holders. If your ground glass isn't in exactly the right position and your roll film holder depth isn't within spec, you may encounter focus problems with your roll film. The greater the enlargement you intend to make, the more critical this will become. Not all roll film holders are as precise as one would desire. I recently ran some tests on mine prior to visiting Glacier and after examining the results, elected to leave it at home. Economy or not, out of focus images are useless to me.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Oregon now (formerly Austria)
    Posts
    3,397

    roll film holders & sheet film in backpack

    Raymond, When I go on day trips, i.e., when I don't have to carry shelter and fo od for several days, I carry lots of stuff: 6-8 sheet film holders, readyload ho lder and a couple of boxes of readyloads, 4-5 lenses, camera, meter(s) filters, accessories, monster tripod, etc., etc., but it's still a pretty light kit when compared with what some people carry aroung routinely. However, when in the wild erness for an extended period, and carrying 35+ pounds of other gear, I try to t rim down as much as possible. The monster tripod gets replaced by a Bogen 3001 w ith a lightweight ball head (I can't afford a Gitzo Mountaineer just yet), the t wo heaviest lenses stay at home (I take the wider ones since I can always crop l ater if I have to), and I bring only the lightest meter and accessories I have. My lenses have been chosen for fieldwork and are extremely small and lightweight . I still carry 5 or 6 filmholders (I can't give up my Tri-X!) and I bring the r eadyload holder and lots of lightweight readyloads in plastic zip-lock bags. I'd leave the filmholders home too if I could get the Tri-X in readyload! Surprisin gly, I don't feel limited by this at all, and when I go day-tripping fro base ca mp, my kit is rewardingly light and I have both hands free for scrambling over r ocks, etc. My philosophy and recommendation: travel as light as you can! Regards , ;^D)

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Oregon now (formerly Austria)
    Posts
    3,397

    roll film holders & sheet film in backpack

    Sorry, after the above long-winded reply I noticed I had forgotten to address th e main issue at hand, that of the roll-film holders! You could leave your longer lenses home and just shoot roll film if it makes your kit lighter, but that wou ldn't be my choice. If you are going to take the 4x5 stuff with you anyway, then leave the roll-film stuff at home and take a readyload (or equivalent) holder a nd pack film instead. This gives you the versatilty of 4x5 and is lighter than t he roll-film back and film! Regards, ;^D)

  6. #6

    roll film holders & sheet film in backpack

    I've never seen Quickloads or Readyloads (I live in a large-format vacuum) so don't exactly know how they work other than that they come in paper sleeves and are somehow kept light-proof and removed in a holder. Since another poster stated that he'd use Tri-X in Readyloads, if available, my question is, can you reuse the readyload sleeves and put your own film in them? Are they destroyed when you open them for processing?

    Maybe there is a market for selling boxes of paper sleeves.

Similar Threads

  1. sheet film processing in film holders
    By Terence Spross in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 31-Jan-2006, 11:14
  2. Sharpness of Sheet Film vs Roll Film
    By John Cook in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 14-Oct-2005, 13:33
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-Dec-2004, 12:08
  4. Differences in roll film/sheet film emulsions
    By John Kasaian in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2-Oct-2003, 19:55
  5. Sheet film storage in film holders
    By Mark Windom in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 17-Nov-1999, 20:33

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •