Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Processing film to completion: my personal drama

  1. #1
    Marco Gilardetti's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Torino, Italy
    Posts
    33

    Processing film to completion: my personal drama

    Gentlemen, I'm in doubt. I've spent all of my life in being very picky on temperature and time of process and I've applied the Zone System every time I could. However, I recently switched to a diffuser enlarger, with which I noticed that I needed a raise of contrast of at least one full grade higher than usual. I then started to increase my film developing time accordingly, but that made me realize that the higher the contrast, the easier it was to work with the diffuser head. Scratches and spots were less evident, exposure time was easier to handle, Newton rings didn't even have a chance to appear...

    But now I reached a point in which I think I'm developing my films almost to completion. The fact that I completely changed my habit of being extremely precise on developement worries me. What am I missing, after all these years of extremely precise work? It seems that, since I (almost) always use multigrade paper, the tonal range of the negative has little or no matter since every drift can be fixed with a little turn of a filter's knob and maybe some dodging.

    So, now what? Do I have to assume that all the pain in developement control was worth only in the days in which papers were available in few grades, and even less were on the shop's stands, so one wanted to have a film which would always print fine on grade "2"? Now that one can get from "00" to "5" with a single pack of fresh paper, the pain is not worth anymore? What am I missing? Please, your thoughts!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    4,589

    Processing film to completion: my personal drama

    You have grown up. Not everyone does -- consider yourself fortunate
    Wilhelm (Sarasota)

  3. #3
    Donald Qualls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,092

    Processing film to completion: my personal drama

    Some level of control at the negative stage -- getting the exposure somewhere close to correct, having some ability to stretch or compress contrast -- is helpful for dealing with lighting conditions at the time of exposure. Got a flat subject to begin with, and an overcast day (and can't wait for the sun to come out)? With your development, that might not be a big deal. What about a portrait on a sunny day in the mountains, when you might want to soften things a bit to avoid glaring, blocked highlights and completely detail-free shadows in the same face? You might find your 00 filter none too soft, and the ability to intentionally dial back your developing and know in advance what the effect will be (how much exposure to add for the loss of speed from reduced development, exactly how much to reduce development to get the contrast you want and so forth) is very helpful.

    No, not everyone wants or needs this capability, on which the Zone System is based. If you like the images you're getting and never or seldom have a "problem" negative with so much contrast you can't control it with your filters and multigrade paper, then there isn't a problem -- what you need depends on what you have and what you want.

    For me, at least for now, much of what I'm trying to learn in photography is putting an image on the negative that doesn't require a bunch of manipulation of contrast, dodging and burning, etc. to produce a good final image, and that seems certain to require, pretty soon, reasonably precise control of exposure and contrast, of the sorts that the Zone System exists to quantify. FWIW, I've never printed on graded paper -- Polycontrast was the only thing in the darkroom when I made my first "on my own" prints -- but I was still often dissatisfied with what I could get, because my negatives weren't right. Soon I'll have my darkroom setup (for the first time in almost 25 years). I don't think I'll find *I* can abandon contrast control in my negatives...
    If a contact print at arm's length is too small to see, you need a bigger camera. :D

  4. #4

    Processing film to completion: my personal drama

    Yup, modern materials are really great. Except when they aren't. One caution. Some VC papers suffer from what's known as "curve splitting" at the lower contrast settings. You get a flat area in the curve, and no tonal separation. You might want to get a step tablet and check your particular paper/filter combination to see how low you can go. It's easy- just look for any two steps blending together or having reduced contrast. Typically happens at grade 0 or 00. Other than that, make reasonable negs and take advantage of what the paper can do.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,599

    Processing film to completion: my personal drama

    Marco,

    Sounds like its time for an 8x10 and contact prints on AZO!
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  6. #6
    Marco Gilardetti's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Torino, Italy
    Posts
    33

    Processing film to completion: my personal drama

    Oh, hi there Donald, I recall you being on photo.net and APUG. I don't think you got the point exactly: I'm not saying that I expose randomly and push develop to death. That would of course lead to poor results. I always expose accurately, and now develop to completion. Think about it: an overexposure would "block highlights", but a correct exposure followed by a complete developement should only spread the tonal range over a broader contrast, as far as I see. That would be all coal and chalk on paper 2, but all the tonal range would still be on the negative and could be eventually "compressed back" if printed on soft paper.

    @ Conrad: I see your point, but things are such that with a diffuser head, I don't remember ever going lower than a grade "2" filter setting with this technique.

    @ John: give time to time, I just started experimenting with POP paper and my 2x3'' gear...

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Processing film to completion: my personal drama

    Variable contrast paper isn't a substitute for a good negative. When you change paper contrast you change everything, the shadows, the midtones, and the highlights. By moving from say a #2 filter to a #4 filter you might get the highlights you want but then you might also lose the shadow detail and midtone range you wanted. Or you might get the deep blacks you wanted but lose the highlight detail. When you alter a negative by development you change only the highlights, the midtones and shadows remain the same (well not exactly the same but very close). It's sometimes possible to make a decent print from a bad negative by alterning the paper contrast and by extensive dodging, burning, etc. but it sure isn't as enjoyable or as effective as it is to start with a good negative from which you can easily make a decent straight print, then use those same techniques to make an excellent print instead of just a decent one.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  8. #8

    Processing film to completion: my personal drama

    Marco,

    " I always expose accurately, and now develop to completion. Think about it: an overexposure would "block highlights", but a correct exposure followed by a complete developement should only spread the tonal range over a broader contrast, as far as I see."

    You just quoted William Mortensen, the anti-christ of the zone system. LOL. The only problem I have seen is that the new films can reach a density level that takes forever to print. The extra film speed isn't a bother either.

    Have fun with it.

  9. #9

    Processing film to completion: my personal drama

    John stated my thoughts exactly earlier. When you think that you have things "dialed" in with your darkroom work, comtemplate working with a fixed grade paper that has the dramatically long tonal scale that Azo is famous for. You will appreciate your regimented approach toward your photography as any deficiency in one's work (with Azo) will be terribly frustrating in the process. No variable contrast filters to trump you out of a mistake and the like. But the rewards are glorious.

    Onward!

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    538

    Processing film to completion: my personal drama

    Marco, you asked what you are missing. My answer would be efficiency.

    As I have said here in the past, when I was a student in art school I could print every bit as well as Ansel Adams. All it took for a perfect 8x10 print was a day or two of experimentation, endless burning and dodging, a full 250-sheet box of paper, the entire set of variable contrast printing filters including half-steps, a jug of hot, undiluted Dektol to cotton-swab onto stubborn areas of the print, and a small penlight to flash low density paper spots.

    Then I graduated and found a job at a commercial studio which sold large quantities of 8x10 glossies for 25 cents apiece. Needless to say, my employer rather forcefully “encouraged” me to pick up the pace, by learning to make negatives which did not require this kind of intensive care to save them.

    To this day, I continue to be absolutely dumbfounded by the self-proclaimed artsy-fartsy types who advocate split-filter printing and all manner of time and money-wasting techniques which would have been completely unnecessary, had they brought along a simple fill card, cheap portable flashgun or waited an hour for the sun to move before making the exposure.

    As a pro, I was often forced by the client to shoot things against my will, when the lighting was just awful. The Secretary of Defense is not about to wait around to dedicate a new submarine until the photographer decides that the light is sufficiently sensitive and poetic to proceed. My art school printing techniques were sometimes needed to save these negatives.

    But now retired, I have stubbornly just ordered a large load of grade two paper.

    Only.

    An old friend in California used to make jokes about a fine art photographer he knew who was incredibly laid-back. The story was that every morning he would hang an exposure meter out the window from his bed under the sill. If it didn’t read at least f/11 he would just roll over and go back to sleep.

    Now in my golden years, I intend to wait for perfect light conditions and carefully process negatives that even a machine (my wife) can print. ;0)

Similar Threads

  1. How do you sell/finance your personal work?
    By Daniel Grenier in forum Business
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 18-Jul-2005, 15:27
  2. Personal Film Speed
    By Neil Miller in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 5-Apr-2002, 07:50
  3. What is your personal ISO speed for Fp4+?
    By abiggs in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 14-Jun-2001, 13:37
  4. personal film speed with tri-x and pyro w/ no color densitometer
    By Craig Allen in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-Jan-2001, 08:31
  5. Defining one's personal ASA for a film
    By Robert Ruderman in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22-May-1998, 22:00

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •