Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Vuescan vs. Silverfast SE/Ai

  1. #21
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Vuescan vs. Silverfast SE/Ai

    "With the new Silverfast, the registration is usually perfect, even at 16 scans." Though I only find 16X necessary on images with large shadow areas.

    My experience too, though ecery once in awhile I get an out of register one maybe one in 15. It maybe do to humidity changes from heat during the scan or something because the next scan of the same negative will be fine.
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    2,428

    Vuescan vs. Silverfast SE/Ai

    I have testing leaving the negative in the scanner for while before scanning, but then the heat from the bulb would not be on. Perhaps the best bet would be to do two in a row, with the first as preheat for the second.

  3. #23

    Vuescan vs. Silverfast SE/Ai

    The combination of SilverFast SE Plus and SF HDR ist a powerful and economic solution

    SilverFast SE Plus has our patented Multi-Sampling function and also supports scanning into raw 48 bit HDR data. So you can create a noise free full dynamic range scan. Then you open the data in SilverFast HDR and quickly optimize your images and run the final processing with the SF HDR JobManager.

    More detailson SF SE Plus can be found here: http://www.silverfast.com/show/silverfast-seplus/en.html

    and on SF HDR here: http://www.silverfast.com/show/silverfast-hdr/en.html

    Ian Lyons tutorials on working with SF HDR: http://www.computer-darkroom.com/hdr_tutorial/hdr_1.htm

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    2,428

    Vuescan vs. Silverfast SE/Ai

    > Is there a way to incorporate single pass multisampling into Vuescan?

    The current version has this, if your scanner will support it. It will do multi-sampling in a single pass on my 9950. The downside is that multi-sampling is so slow at 4800 that the heat will pop the negative. Works much better at 2400 because there is so much less data to move, but then you can just scan at 4800 and down sample for the same effect. (Scanning at 4800 is not really 4800, but it is a very efficient multi-sample for 2400.)

    > A way to reduce noise (and possibly to increase dynamic range by a tiny ammount) is just to oversample. Scan at the full sampling frequency of the scanner (4800 ppi) and have the scanning software downsample. Vuescan will do this; I'd be surprised if silverfast didn't too.

    Silverfast will fool you - if you select 4800 and select downsampling, it just scans at a lower resolution, at least on the 9950.

Similar Threads

  1. scanning B&W (HP5+) negs with Vuescan
    By Alex Ragen in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-Feb-2006, 05:14
  2. FYI vuescan and canon 9950F
    By robc in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 21-Nov-2005, 13:15
  3. Vuescan reborn
    By Ed Richards in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 26-Jun-2005, 13:54
  4. Silverfast value?
    By ronald moravec in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-Jan-2005, 11:44
  5. VueScan on Mac OS X
    By Mark Muse in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 30-Jun-2004, 15:19

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •