Page 31 of 31 FirstFirst ... 21293031
Results 301 to 306 of 306

Thread: B&H No Longer Shipping Chemistry

  1. #301

    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Bellingham, WA (displaced Canadian)
    Posts
    196

    Re: B&H No Longer Shipping Chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by Sal Santamaura View Post
    Repeated unprovable accusations. Evidence please.
    How are they not provable?

    You literally just need to quote their reasons.

  2. #302

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Posts
    3,122

    Re: B&H No Longer Shipping Chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by Sal Santamaura View Post
    Repeated unprovable accusations. Evidence please...
    Quote Originally Posted by MAubrey View Post
    How are they not provable?

    You literally just need to quote their reasons.
    Reacting rather than thoroughly evaluating possibilities is an excellent way to make unprovable accusations, such as "B&H lied."

    First, read post #245 in this thread:


    Then read how Henry Posner reacted to it in the first part of post #270:


    Finally, consider that B&H might have, since then, further negotiated its agreement(s) with shipping carriers and/or revised its internal procedures/training so that many darkroom chemicals could once again be shipped.

    Can anyone prove B&H lied? No. Unless there's evidence, "quoting reasons" merely repeats an unprovable accusation. Not good.

  3. #303

    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Bellingham, WA (displaced Canadian)
    Posts
    196

    Re: B&H No Longer Shipping Chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by Sal Santamaura View Post
    Reacting rather than thoroughly evaluating possibilities is an excellent way to make unprovable accusations, such as "B&H lied."

    First, read post #245 in this thread:


    Then read how Henry Posner reacted to it in the first part of post #270:


    Finally, consider that B&H might have, since then, further negotiated its agreement(s) with shipping carriers and/or revised its internal procedures/training so that many darkroom chemicals could once again be shipped.

    Can anyone prove B&H lied? No. Unless there's evidence, "quoting reasons" merely repeats an unprovable accusation. Not good.
    The post I'm discussing are all after #290, so that's not relevant.

    We'll have to agree to disagree on the rest. Cheers!

  4. #304

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Posts
    3,122

    Re: B&H No Longer Shipping Chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by MAubrey View Post
    How are they not provable?

    You literally just need to quote their reasons.
    Quote Originally Posted by MAubrey View Post
    The post I'm discussing are all after #290...
    The only posts after #290 are ones that levy accusations. Ignoring posts that preceed it renders reasonable consideration of possibilities impossible.

    Quote Originally Posted by MAubrey View Post
    ...We'll have to agree to disagree on the rest...
    No one has to "agree to disagree." Disagreement is a fact whether involved parties accept it or not.

    After serving on a number of criminal trial juries, as well as observing participant behavior on several Internet forums over the years, I'm very glad that I don't even present the appearance of engaging in anything illegal. The willingness to "convict" without credible evidence is really scary.

  5. #305
    Jim Sidinger
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Denver Area, Colorado USA
    Posts
    131

    Re: B&H No Longer Shipping Chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by Wayne View Post
    ... Points well taken, moving along now I hope....
    This is the last word!
    No. THIS is the last word!
    No. This is the LAST word!
    No. This is REALLY the LAST word!
    No. This is ABSOLUTELY the LAST word!
    .
    .
    .



    (Sorry, couldn't help myself. I know this is serious to some folks ...but really?)

  6. #306

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Suwanee, GA
    Posts
    150

    Re: B&H No Longer Shipping Chemistry

    What irked me today was that Ethol LPD in liquid form is shipped (for free) but the power form is pick up only. Had to order from their NY competitor which also got the rest of my order for Film, Papers, and some other accessories.

Similar Threads

  1. EK no longer on the NYSE
    By Bob McCarthy in forum Business
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 6-Jan-2012, 12:15
  2. No longer an LF virgin...
    By picker77 in forum On Photography
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-Apr-2009, 21:32
  3. I take it we can no longer buy a Chamonix for $700?
    By audioexcels in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 6-Apr-2008, 23:27
  4. Film maybe here longer then you think....
    By Stephen Willard in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 24-Jan-2006, 07:28

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •