Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Questions for Steve Sherman and Sandy King

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    St. Simons Island, Georgia
    Posts
    882

    Questions for Steve Sherman and Sandy King

    I read the thread on Michael A. Smith's site as it was developing last year and tried what Sandy now calls extreme minimal agitation as well as minimal agitation (agitate 1.5 minutes at the beginning then for 10-seconds every three minutes). I developed Efke PL-100 in tubes with Pyrocat HD at both the 1:1:150 dulution and 5:3:300.

    I found the benefits that have been described, but I found two problems, also. First, if I had any significant amount of sky in the photos, I got very mottled development in the sky portions. Second, sometimes I would get greatly increased density along the edges of the negatives. This was more noticeable on 8x10 than on 4x5 for 2-1/4 x 3-1/4.

    For the time being, I've returned to brush development until I've had more time to think about, and perhaps read about these problems.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    5,506

    Questions for Steve Sherman and Sandy King

    "I found the benefits that have been described, but I found two problems, also. First, if I had any significant amount of sky in the photos, I got very mottled development in the sky portions. Second, sometimes I would get greatly increased density along the edges of the negatives. This was more noticeable on 8x10 than on 4x5 for 2-1/4 x 3-1/4."

    I can understand the mottling in the sky areas, which is one of the main reasons I avoid this form of development whenever there is a lot of sky in the scene.

    The greatly increased density along the edges of the negatives, however, is something I have not experienced. Could you explain how you were developing the film, and what kind of container you used.
    For discussion and information about carbon transfer please visit the carbon group at groups.io
    [url]https://groups.io/g/carbon

  3. #13
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,142

    Questions for Steve Sherman and Sandy King

    I occasionally use stand development in tubes 4x5 and 8x10. I have found that subjects of normal to low contrast work better than high contrast (for me anyways). The dangers can be horrific mottling and streaking, which has happened a lot to me especially for stand with no agitation (only at beginning for a minute). If I do intermittant agitation (5 secs every 20 min, and removing the film and replacing inverted) helps eliminate this...but not always! Trays never worked but with intermittant agitation (5 secs every 10 min) it was good. It is important to make extra exposures just in case. When stand development works, it's fantastic.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    494

    Questions for Steve Sherman and Sandy King

    The method I have been using is pyrocat hd in tubes, plastic pipe, with slow continuous agitation. After reading the article in VC I went to Michael & Paula's site and read the thread mentioned above. Earlier in the week I photographed a grain bin and took two shots inside. I decided to try the stand method with one of the negs. using my tube. I filled it up and put the cap on which ended up leaving some air space at the top. I slowly turned the tube over end to end for 1 1/2 minutes then let it stand for the remaining first quarter, following Sandy's method of agitation at the beginning of each quarter hour. Though I turned end for end for 15 seconds instead of ten. After an hour I stopped and fixed. There was a definite difference between the shot developed normally (continuous agitation) and the stand method. I have no way to measure the density (I have a densitometer but I don't think it will work for stained negs.) or to print them yet. If anyone is interested in seeing them I could send them out.

    There is a note of caution here, when putting the film in the tube I left it towards the top open end and when I left the tube stand to develop I always left it with that end facing down to insure the developer would cover the film. There will be some developer loss when the cap is screwed on with air pushing on it. I suppose a small pin hole would releave this pressure but then you would have to seal this for the duration of development.

    Thank you Andrew for your help with getting me started with times for developing Efke 25.

  5. #15

    Questions for Steve Sherman and Sandy King

    Chris,
    I, for one, would like to see the photos. Many thanks!!

  6. #16

    Questions for Steve Sherman and Sandy King

    Many thanks, guys!!

    Once again, I really appreciate each and every response. I have been studying/reading/asking questions about all this while simultaneously re-setting up darkroom and preparing my camera, etc.

    Best Regards,

Similar Threads

  1. T Max 400 Technical Discussion by Sandy King
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 7-Feb-2006, 06:08
  2. Dagor77 or Steven King?
    By Steve Feldman in forum Announcements
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 18-Jan-2004, 20:21
  3. Press King w/ zeiss tessar
    By Laura Koskinen in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 24-Mar-2002, 11:07
  4. Sequoia and King National Parks
    By Howard Slavitt in forum Location & Travel
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23-May-2000, 13:09

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •