Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Reducing back ease of use

  1. #1

    Reducing back ease of use

    Hello,

    I plan to buy a 5x7 camera to do 6x17 and 4x5 work because it looks to be a good solution to work with the two formats without the need to carry 2 dedicated cameras. So I'll use reducing backs.

    However I understand base tilt on the back is going to be an issue as the tilt axis will be very far from the film.

    I wanted to know how feel the reducing backs users ? Is the camera more painful to operate
    with a reducing back?

    thanks

    Henri

  2. #2
    Octogenarian
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Frisco, Texas
    Posts
    3,532

    Reducing back ease of use

    Henri,

    The answer to your question is "not at all". I use a 5X7 camera with a 4X5 reducing back (Canham Traditional), and when either back is placed onto the camera, the ground glass is in the same position. I also found the same ease of use when I formerly used a 4X5 or 5X7 reducing back on an 8X10 camera (Tachihara).

    The only difficulty I have experienced is when I needed to carry more than one reducing back in my kit and protect the unused back(s) from damage.

  3. #3
    Scott Rosenberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    The Incredible Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    859

    Reducing back ease of use

    henri, consider how much of your work will really be differing from the native format of the camera. if you're only occasionally going to shoot 5x7 or 6x17 then it doesn't make a lot of sense to carry around a 5x7 sized camera to shoot predominately 4x5 images. however, if you're going to be doing a healthy mix, then reducing backs is a great solution.

  4. #4
    Jon Wilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    651

    Reducing back ease of use

    Another alternative would be a Tachihara 4x5 with a 5x7 extension back. Food for thought.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Harbor City, California
    Posts
    1,750

    Reducing back ease of use

    I have a 4x5 Graflok reducing back for a 5x7 Deardorff. I purposely made a spacer to put it back far enough to allow the use of the Polaroid 545 holder with its bulge in front. Yes, the image will shift a little when using tilt or swing, but I don't think its anything worth worrying much about.

    If you don't want to use the Polaroid holder, as Eugene indicates, you can mount the reducer groundglass in exactly the same plane as the original.

  6. #6

    Reducing back ease of use

    Henri,

    I have a 5x7 linhof and carry the 5x7 back, 4x5 reducing back and canham 6x17 back. I also have a 4x5 Linhof that I don't carry anymore because I use the 5x7 for everything. With the extra bellows draw on the 5x7 I can shoot with a 600mm and do macro with more stability. So to answer your question I have no added pain using the reducing back.

  7. #7

    Reducing back ease of use

    Brian and all,

    Many thanks for your feedbacks. The hint about polaroid back is certainly useful.
    Before taking the plunge and buy a 5x7 Arca Swiss I have found your feedbacks very valuable.

Similar Threads

  1. Sinar 4x5 Back on Deardorff Reducing Back...
    By Capocheny in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 4-Nov-2005, 23:08
  2. Where to find a 5Wisner 5x7 reducing back
    By Bruce E. Rathbun in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 16-Nov-2004, 11:25
  3. Reducing back for 5x7
    By Mike Cockerham in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25-Aug-2004, 23:17
  4. sinar 5x7 to 4x5 reducing back
    By James Driscoll in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-May-2002, 01:09
  5. ansco 5x7 reducing back
    By kenneth wayne lessing in forum Gear
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-Aug-1999, 14:19

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •