Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: metering question

  1. #1

    metering question

    Lets say it's a sunny, clear sky day. Sunny 16 rule kind of day. If I meter in reflecting mode, facing north and get a reading of 1/100 @ f16 with filmspeed of 100; Should I be able to turn around and face south and meter again in incident mode and get the same reading?

    I'm using a Sekonic L 508c (it really dosen't have a 1/100 sec speed setting, but 125 is close enough). Would I be more accurate to meter off a grey card instead of north sky? It seems like I should be able to turn around and face south and get the same reading in incident mode.

    I've tried this but the sky wasen't exactly clear. (some high thin white clouds were present). I don't remember the results, but I remember they weren't the same.

    dee

  2. #2

    metering question

    You would get more or less the same reading only if your measured a surface with the same reflectance as that to which your incident meter is adjusted.

  3. #3
    Moderator Ralph Barker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Rio Rancho, NM
    Posts
    5,034

    metering question

    "Should I be able to turn around and face south and meter again in incident mode and get the same reading?"

    Yes. No. Maybe so, depending on how you hold your mouth. ;-)

    There are so many variables involved in metering techniques that discussions of them are often more confusing than illuminating. (pun intended, of course)

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    1,031

    metering question

    Why should a reflected meter reading give the same value as an incident reading? All a reflected-reading light meter knows how to do, is to read a subject that reflects 18% of the light that strikes it. If the subject is lighter or darker than that 18% middle gray, the meter reading will differ accordingly, requiring the photographer to manually adjust the actual exposure from what the meter recommends.

    An incident reading assumes the same 18%, since that is what gets through the dome and strikes the metering cell. The difference, of course, is that the incident meter is not affected by the subject reflectance. Of course, if the subject is extremely light or dark, the photographer may still need to adjust...

    IF the subject reflects 18% of the light, and IF the meter is used correctly in both reflected and incident modes, THEN the two readings should be the same.

  5. #5

    metering question

    Hi Dee,

    I second to Alan's opinion. Meters are calibrated for certain reflectance, I'd say around 18% (there are few great threads here around how exactly are meters calibrated).

    what is important, if the desired scenario overall is lighter than 18% grey you might ended up to uderexpose film if you take reflected reading and that I presume you do not want. On sunny day I would take incident readings on a sunny day to get accurate readings, again unless whole scenario is not in shade or something.

  6. #6

    metering question

    Please post the answer as to how many angels can dance on sphere of a Sekonic meter.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    184

    metering question

    42

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    obx,nc
    Posts
    173

    metering question

    ""IF the subject reflects 18% of the light, and IF the meter is used correctly in both reflected and incident modes, THEN the two readings should be the same.""

    This is what I wanted to know.

    And...it's the square of the shutter speed divided by the inverse square of the f/ stop times the log of the E.I. that determins the number of angels that can fit on the incident dome. I think I saw a formula on this at P.net.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    711

    metering question

    Now I have all of those tiny footprints on my sphere. I lost count, too.

  10. #10
    Scott Davis
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,875

    metering question

    I would say that actually, depending on the angle of incidence of the sun, you would get a different reading, because the incident dome would be in the shadow of the meter when you take the reading from the south, assuming you are holding the meter truly perpendicular to the ground. That would explain your variance in readings.

Similar Threads

  1. light metering???
    By david clark in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8-Mar-2004, 05:37
  2. Metering snow?
    By Gavin Walker in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 4-Feb-2002, 15:27
  3. Close up metering
    By fw in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 5-Sep-2001, 14:58
  4. Metering against the light
    By Julio Fernandez in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 29-Nov-2000, 11:52
  5. Metering through filters
    By Kevin Kemner in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 24-Sep-1999, 12:46

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •