Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Wehman 8x10 - first impression

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    489

    Wehman 8x10 - first impression

    I thought some of you might be interested in my first impression of the Wehman 8x10 camera. I have had the camera now for a little over a week. The lens I use with it is the Fuijon 300-C f8.5. It is a very light and compact lens that is very sharp and has an image circle of about 380mm – which is sufficient for landscape photography – so far I have not run out of coverage.

    What I like about the Wehman 8x10:
    The camera is absolutely bullet proof. Folded it is completely surrounded by a metal clam shell. You really can take this camera and throw it in your backpack without any concern about scratches or damages. The little Fuijon lens can stay attached when the camera is folded – that makes it a very neat, light package.
    The camera comes with two sets of ground glasses – one is glass, the other one is plexiglass. I installed the plexiglass, because it is lighter and I don’t have to worry about braking it. If only using lenses up to 300mm you can leave one of the metal clam shells at home and instead just put a film holder over the GG – saves weight. With that configuration, including the lens, the weight is just 8 lbs.
    The beauty of this camera lies in its simplicity and its low weight. I don’t think you can make a camera that is simpler in its construction and still gives you the rigidity of the Wehman. It is solid as a rock. The back has a little spring that holds it open to make it easier to insert the film holder- - I found that feature very helpful. Setup is quick and easy. The back folds up, you slide the front standard forward, lock it and you’re good to go.

    What I don’t like or miss:
    There are no levels on this camera at all and there is no scale on it to help with hyperfocal distance focusing. The lensboard fits very tightly and you almost have to rip it out of the front standard, I talked to Bruce and he assured me that this would get better with useage – if not, I’ll have to sand it down just a little.
    The Wehman comes without a fresnel lens installed. The zero detends are not pronounced enough and I always have to double check to make sure that the standards are parallel.
    The rear swing mechanism takes some time getting used to – it is very unique to this camera – it would take too long to explain it – just take a look at the Wehman website to get an idea how it works (this is not necessarily a negative point – it’s just different).
    Front swing, shift and movement of the Standard are all controlled by one single knob – it is almost impossible to get this right. You unscrew the front standard, lift it and then position it to either the swing or shift position, or both.
    There is no provision to clip on a dark cloth, which would come handy.

    Overall I am very pleased with this camera – it is really hard to beat for the price, but I do think there is room for improvements. This is my first 8x10 camera and I am still at the bottom of a steep learning curve. I realized that DOF it is a very different beast with this larger format. I have been shooting 4x5 for about three years now, but this is a different world.
    I would be interested to hear from other Wehman owners if they concur with my observations or if I am way off here.
    I would recommend this camera to folks who focus on the functionality of a camera, not the looks and who look for a practical backpacking solution.
    Juergen

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Lincoln, Northern California
    Posts
    166

    Wehman 8x10 - first impression

    " The rear swing mechanism takes some time getting used to – it is very unique to this camera – it would take too long to explain it"

    I believe that the rear swing is very similar to my Kodak Master Camera. I looked very closely at buying the Wehman. I just could not swing the extra $$$. I think that Bruce very eloquently designed & built the camera. I would be the natural, modern upgrade from the KMV.

    Cheers,
    Geary
    Small Minds...What cannot be cured, must be endured.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    628

    Wehman 8x10 - first impression

    I agree that front shift or swing is fussy. However I never use any shift, and prefer to use rear swing, where I appreciate the fact that it is geared. So for me these shortcomings don't come into play.

    Front rise is modest, maybe it could be more. Some might miss center tilt (not me, I prefer base). If you use lenses longer than 600mm, the bellows will be too short (not me, I wish I had a 600!). An accessory shoe somewhere on the back would be nice, so you could put a level in it. I can imagine the three little plastic nubbins that hold the front bed in place might wear out, I wish they seemed more substantial.

    These are all minor nits, overwhelmed, IMHO, by the significant advantages: cheap, lightweight, bombproof, fully functional, easy to use. I'm happy with mine, can't really imagine any reason ever to trade up.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    553

    Wehman 8x10 - first impression

    Thank you for your comments. What about materials? Looking at the images seems to be made with somekind of coloured fiberglass, and thin aluminum for the standards and rails. Are the shell made also in aluminum?

    Some thoughts: I´m afraid about the curvature of the plexiglass screen (specially at the 8x10" size!). Levels are not an issue to me, I never use the levels installed on my cameras (they are useless bulls eye or diminute vial levels!). I always use a spare hardware vial level.

    It seems to be a very intelligent&practical design; congratulations for your purchase. Enjoy it.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Wehman 8x10 - first impression

    "The rear swing mechanism takes some getting used to - it is very unique to this camera."

    I was under the impression that the Wehman had an asymetrical back like the Ebony SU line of cameras. Is this what you're referring to? If so, it should be a positive for the camera, Ebony adds about $1,000 to the price of its cameras to get the asymetrical back.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    489

    Wehman 8x10 - first impression

    Jose, yes the material is some kind of fiberglass - there is actually no wood at all on this camera. The shells are made of aluminum and so are the standards - they look thin, but they are actually very rigid. Thanks for the advice on the plexi glass - I'll see what happens to it.

    Brian, I don't think the back of the Wehman is really asymetrical. You loosen two knobs and then you move the standard and at the same time hold on with one hand so that the focus rack doesn't move. I am sure that with time it wil become 2nd nature to use it, but for now it is weird.

    As I said, I think it is a great camera and an even greater value.
    Juergen

Similar Threads

  1. Opinions on Tachihara and Wehman 8x10
    By Roger Richards in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 26-Jul-2005, 11:04
  2. Which Berlebach for a 8x10 Wehman?
    By Juergen Sattler in forum Gear
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 15-Apr-2005, 13:01
  3. Wehman 8x10
    By Juergen Sattler in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-Apr-2005, 14:25
  4. Wehman 8x10
    By David Hosten in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 18-Sep-2003, 10:57
  5. Wehman 8x10 field cameras
    By Russell Fox in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 24-Apr-2002, 21:23

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •