Serge, I don't mean to hijack your thread but Paul asked if a vacuum would not add a static charge in the same way that a jet of air would. Air compressors typically heat and dry out the air that they produce. Less moisture and higher temps in that air are more likely to produce static than more moist air such as the typical ambient air. Dryer air has a higher potential for carrying a charge. When you add the velocity produced by a typical nozzle you have the friction of the air over the surface to add to the effect.
Vacuums do not dry the air, and the velocity of the airflow is lower. Add in the fact that sucking the dust up and containing it means that it cannot be redeposited on your film holder or film or whatever part you are cleaning so I still think a vacuum is better. Also in general for keeping your film and holders clean, higher humidity is your friend because there will be less stuff floating in the air to begin with.
Now if you want to try something that blows air, try this: <a href="http://www.exair.com/static_eliminator/iaj_page.htm" target= _blank">Exair Static Eliminator<a/> You might get really great results in cleaning your film holders and film.
And for everyone who is happy blowing dust with compressed air - I'm not saying you are wrong or that your results are not good. If it works for you then keep doing it.
Bookmarks