In looking at the Ken Burns documentaries being shown recently on my local PBS stations, it occurred to me that the images from the Civil War (War Between the States) and Western exploration times up to the turn of the century have a natural beauty -- a crispness and lack of grain compared to later images, such as those from The Roosevelts .
Of course many of the 20thCentury pictures are stills taken from motion picture frames, which might explain some of it, but the works of W. H. Jackson, Timothy Sullivan, etc, are just a joy to look at despite the lack of shadow details, damaged prints, and whitened-out skies. Even the large contact prints by such contemporary masters as Michael Smith do not have this mysterious quality.
Any thoughts?
Maybe I'm all wet?
Bookmarks