Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 59

Thread: Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Wherever My Laptop Is (Usually Australia)
    Posts
    32

    Re: Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post
    Each film has its own characteristics so check foma's chart on this. It isn't the same for all films.

    BUT you've got the idea now
    The table I posted above was from the Fomapan 100 classic data sheet, I believe.

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post

    Many people also suggest that you shoot one stop longer then suggested and then develop 10% less time, in order to reduce the contrast of the image, as long exposures can be high in contrast.

    There are many techniques and you have to find your own way, definitely takes more time than digital, but also very rewarding.

    Thanks, will keep that tip in mind for the next experiments.

    Certainly a lot to keep in mind and it does take much more time than digital, but from my very limited experience with LF so far well worth the effort.

  2. #12
    Richard Johnson
    Guest

    Re: Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

    If you are working close then you also need to account for the bellows extension factor, which is widely published as well.

    Between the that and reciprocity you could easily be many stops off.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Wherever My Laptop Is (Usually Australia)
    Posts
    32

    Re: Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Johnson View Post
    If you are working close then you also need to account for the bellows extension factor, which is widely published as well.

    Between the that and reciprocity you could easily be many stops off.
    Yes, I just learnt about the bellows extension factor.

    Not sure if I completely understand how to calculate it but just tried the following and the resulting negative looks, to my amateur eye, fantastic.

    210mm = total belows length

    lens = 135mm

    diff = 210 - 135 = 75

    75/135 = 0.56

    0.56 + 1 = 1.56 **2 = 2.4336 Bellows FACTOR

    Recalculated original settings (in OP) using EV pairs app down to f 8:

    f 8 @ ISO 80 = 10 seconds
    10 x 8 = 80 seconds
    80 x 2.43 = 195 seconds

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    5,308

    Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

    Quote Originally Posted by secondhandrobot View Post
    Yes, I just learnt about the bellows extension factor.

    Not sure if I completely understand how to calculate it but just tried the following and the resulting negative looks, to my amateur eye, fantastic.

    210mm = total belows length

    lens = 135mm

    diff = 210 - 135 = 75

    75/135 = 0.56

    0.56 + 1 = 1.56 **2 = 2.4336 Bellows FACTOR

    Recalculated original settings (in OP) using EV pairs app down to f 8:

    f 8 @ ISO 80 = 10 seconds
    10 x 8 = 80 seconds
    80 x 2.43 = 195 seconds
    There's a simpler way in most cases (not telephoto lenses but normal ones, telephoto almost always have a T in their designation and are usually huge, so don't worry about mixing them up, you won't).

    At infinity focus, your bellows distance should roughly equal your focal length.

    So, 135mm lens should have 135mm bellows extension at infinity (focused on a far away mountain

    Every time you double the bellows, you add two stops of light loss, SO

    Assume you are shooting the 135mm and your meter says 1/60th if a second, then you're focussing close so your bellows are at 270mm, your exposure would be 1/15th of a second. That's double = 2 stops.

    Get it? So say your bellows are at 200mm that's about half MORE bellows than infinity, so that would be 1 stop, so 1/30th of a second.

    It's much easier to think about it that way (think) than making crazy equations, but I'm not a math guy, some people find my way crazy, it's really very individual, everyone has their own method that works easiest for them.

    EDIT: also remember to calculate in the RIGHT ORDER, that order being in the path of light, so star with the aperture and shutter speed (light traveling through the lens) THEN the bellows compensation (light traveling through the bellows) THEN the reciprocity (light hitting the film).

    If you do reciprocity first and then bellows extension, you'll get it wrong.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Wherever My Laptop Is (Usually Australia)
    Posts
    32

    Re: Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post
    There's a simpler way in most cases (not telephoto lenses but normal ones, telephoto almost always have a T in their designation and are usually huge, so don't worry about mixing them up, you won't).

    At infinity focus, your bellows distance should roughly equal your focal length.

    So, 135mm lens should have 135mm bellows extension at infinity (focused on a far away mountain

    Every time you double the bellows, you add two stops of light loss, SO

    Assume you are shooting the 135mm and your meter says 1/60th if a second, then you're focussing close so your bellows are at 270mm, your exposure would be 1/15th of a second. That's double = 2 stops.

    Get it? So say your bellows are at 200mm that's about half MORE bellows than infinity, so that would be 1 stop, so 1/30th of a second.

    It's much easier to think about it that way (think) than making crazy equations, but I'm not a math guy, some people find my way crazy, it's really very individual, everyone has their own method that works easiest for them.
    Got it. That does make it a bit easier to figure out without a calculator handy.

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post

    EDIT: also remember to calculate in the RIGHT ORDER, that order being in the path of light, so star with the aperture and shutter speed (light traveling through the lens) THEN the bellows compensation (light traveling through the bellows) THEN the reciprocity (light hitting the film).

    If you do reciprocity first and then bellows extension, you'll get it wrong.
    Hmmm, good point and good way to think about it. But, I thought for basic multiplication, if only using multiplication, the order does not matter. As in:

    10 x 2.43 x 8 = 194.4

    10 x 8 x 2.43 = 194.4

    Anyway, had a fun night of shooting, best results so far thanks to yours and others' advice - really appreciate it. Much to learn yet though.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    5,308

    Re: Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

    Quote Originally Posted by secondhandrobot View Post
    Got it. That does make it a bit easier to figure out without a calculator handy.



    Hmmm, good point and good way to think about it. But, I thought for basic multiplication, if only using multiplication, the order does not matter. As in:

    10 x 2.43 x 8 = 194.4

    10 x 8 x 2.43 = 194.4

    Anyway, had a fun night of shooting, best results so far thanks to yours and others' advice - really appreciate it. Much to learn yet though.
    On the math.

    PEMDAS, math order does matter.

    Light is also directional, order matters

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6

    Re: Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post
    On the math.

    PEMDAS, math order does matter.

    Light is also directional, order matters
    For strictly multiplication, the order does not matter.

  8. #18
    Nodda Duma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Batesville, Arkansas
    Posts
    1,116

    Re: Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

    You might also want to try Fuji Acros 100. Really good reciprocity characteristics.
    Newly made large format dry plates available! Look:
    https://www.pictoriographica.com

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    187

    Re: Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

    Quote Originally Posted by secondhandrobot View Post
    Yes, I just learnt about the bellows extension factor.

    Not sure if I completely understand how to calculate it but just tried the following and the resulting negative looks, to my amateur eye, fantastic.

    210mm = total belows length

    lens = 135mm

    diff = 210 - 135 = 75

    75/135 = 0.56

    0.56 + 1 = 1.56 **2 = 2.4336 Bellows FACTOR

    Recalculated original settings (in OP) using EV pairs app down to f 8:

    f 8 @ ISO 80 = 10 seconds
    10 x 8 = 80 seconds
    80 x 2.43 = 195 seconds
    The Reciprocity Timer app makes these calculations simple.
    135mm lens at 210mm means you add 1.33 stops.
    For Foma 100 with a metered exposure of 3 mins and 20 secs (the closest the app has to your time) the recommended exposure time is pretty much 4 hours.
    For Fuji Acros 100 the exposure time would be 13 minutes.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    OK, USA
    Posts
    283

    Re: Long Exposure - Very Different Results Between Digital and 4x5 Film

    I think I'd crank the lights up a little brighter. Ha!

    Reducing the reflected light behind the subject can be accomplished by not having anything behind the subject that reflects light. Hint, hint. ;-)

Similar Threads

  1. How Do You Set Long Exposure?
    By RedSun in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 8-Jun-2014, 09:07
  2. Tried my First Long Exposure
    By Pfiltz in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 14-Jul-2013, 17:27
  3. Long Exposure
    By David Solow in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 8-Apr-2011, 02:56
  4. long exposure and 10/8
    By Mr. Doyle in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 4-Jul-2007, 10:15
  5. Use of NPS as a long exposure film
    By claudiocambon in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 28-Dec-2006, 07:41

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •