Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: salvaging under processed images

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Suwanee, GA
    Posts
    1,085

    salvaging under processed images

    through a moment of idiocy I failed to mix HC110 to full strength. So my negatives are very thin. They do seem to have some detail. Images were a mix of still life flowers (easily reshot) and landscapes in the mountains. Is there any chance I can salvage these by toning the negative or do I just chalk it up to a learning experience and take a weekend trip back to the mountains? would scanning them reveal whether it is worth the effort to try something like toning the negatives?

    film is HP5 and FP4. both rated at 1/2 box speed and process at about 71 degrees for normal box times.

  2. #2
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,749

    Re: salvaging under processed images

    Read up on intensification.

  3. #3
    Gary Beasley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Marietta Ga. East Cobb.
    Posts
    727

    Re: salvaging under processed images

    Bleaching and redeveloping with a staining type developer like pyro will bring the density up and can be repeated if the first go around in still too thin. I'm sure theres plenty of detail on the net for you toresearch in this direction, have fun with it.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,856

    Re: salvaging under processed images

    Scanning can salvage thin negs nicely.
    Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
    Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
    Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
    You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,492

    Re: salvaging under processed images

    Quote Originally Posted by esearing View Post
    through a moment of idiocy I failed to mix HC110 to full strength. So my negatives are very thin. They do seem to have some detail. Images were a mix of still life flowers (easily reshot) and landscapes in the mountains. Is there any chance I can salvage these by toning the negative or do I just chalk it up to a learning experience and take a weekend trip back to the mountains? would scanning them reveal whether it is worth the effort to try something like toning the negatives?

    film is HP5 and FP4. both rated at 1/2 box speed and process at about 71 degrees for normal box times.
    HC-110 comes in a very concentrated form. So are you saying that you diluted it more than necessary?

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    647

    Re: salvaging under processed images




    Just don't do what he's doing in the video...not wearing gloves when using selenium toner. ALWAYS wear gloves and have proper ventilation if you are going to do this...be safe!

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    954

    Re: salvaging under processed images

    Photo-Formulary sells several intensification formulas. Just don't expect a truly beautiful result.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    515

    Re: salvaging under processed images

    Personally I'd try playing with them in the darkroom.
    I've had some soft (Funky) wallpaper like effects with similar negatives in the past.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Suwanee, GA
    Posts
    1,085

    Re: salvaging under processed images

    Quote Originally Posted by djdister View Post
    HC-110 comes in a very concentrated form. So are you saying that you diluted it more than necessary?
    Yes, I hate to admit it, but I used TableSpoon measure instead of Ounce measure. So I had about 1/2 the HC-110 needed. Some of the sheets did get a minute longer of devlopment and they seem the most salvagable. Contact prints don't have much detail though.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    166

    Re: salvaging under processed images

    Selenium toning should be the last thing you try, not because its no good but because it is irreversible and none of the other choices will work after doing it.
    Try a few cycles of rehal bleach and redeveloping first as suggested above.
    You can also try a chromium intensifier if you are happy with handling dichromate and hydrochloric acid. Formulas should be easy to find here or at apug

Similar Threads

  1. Salvaging Old Glass Plates
    By WmRenick in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-Dec-2014, 15:21
  2. Cross-Processed Images
    By ThePhilosopher in forum On Photography
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 25-Nov-2009, 14:19
  3. RTP 64 processed b&w
    By Eduardo Aigner in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-Apr-2008, 06:24
  4. Salvaging a damaged lens
    By Ed Richards in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 26-Feb-2008, 21:27
  5. Claw marks in 4x5 processed images?
    By Paul Kent in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 3-May-2004, 15:56

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •