Fomapan 100, 200 and 400

[Daniel Unkefer]

Eighteen sheets of 6x9cm Foma, Ilford FP4+, and Efke PL100, processed in my new Jobo 2500 in one run, and hanging to dry. I would say a success! Images shot with Plaubel Makiflex, Plaubel Makina, and one 6x6cm Hasselblad.

001 by Nokton48, on Flickr

[Domingo A. Siliceo]

This just arrived from Germany to my doorstep.
300 sheets 9x12cm Foma Retropan Soft 320

[...]

I also just received a 4x5 box of it. In my case, I'll try to get slides.

[Scott --]

Trying to get back into shooting LF - getting closer, but not there yet. Arista.EDU Ultra 100 in Adonal 1:100 (10:00 at 21C). Reciprocity is, and has always been, ridiculous with this film. Metered 30 seconds, shot at 5:45.

Fall CSA by Scott, on Flickr

[kleinbatavia]

Might just be the reflection, but the brownish sheets look like they need some more stab to me, they seem not to have cleared...

Eighteen sheets of 6x9cm Foma, Ilford FP4+, and Efke PL100, processed in my new Jobo 2500 in one run, and hanging to dry. I would say a success! Images shot with Plaubel Makiflex, Plaubel Makina, and one 6x6cm Hasselblad.

001 by Nokton48, on Flickr

[towolf]

I think the stand development made the object stand out from the background here?



Bought a box of Fomapan 400 in 9x12 to be able to use my other half of holders and a development cage. The inner bag had a 3-4cm rip in it. Maco already replaced it.

This is hand-held at f5.6 with Technika 5 and a laser pointer in the rangefinder port. Overlay the two laser dots and it’s in focus. Works quite well it seems.

[kleinbatavia]

Experimenting with tanol. More for prints than scans, but quite decent in digital too.

Foma 200, 4x10, arca, tanol 1+1+100, 16 minutes, manual inversions, 20C.



PS how do I insert a full image in line?

[koraks]

PS how do I insert a full image in line?

Upload it elsewhere and then include it into your post. The forum software automatically resizes them if you upload your images to this forum.

[kleinbatavia]

Upload it elsewhere and then include it into your post. The forum software automatically resizes them if you upload your images to this forum.

Thank you, I'll try. It's a shame to create images on large sheets of film to only have them display as thumbnails. Just had a look, even at the forum size 4x10 does not really work. There's too much details disappearing because of the relative "lack" of width. Here the picture I posted means nothing. On a large display it is quite nice with a tonality that I never managed when using rodinal, hc110, etc. Alas.

[koraks]

Yes, I've also always experienced this as a minor inconvenience, particularly when browsing these threads. And then again, even a bigger Web image cannot convey the nuances of a real print. The digital domain is just different, with its own drawbacks and advantages.

[Colorado CJ]

Yes, I've also always experienced this as a minor inconvenience, particularly when browsing these threads. And then again, even a bigger Web image cannot convey the nuances of a real print. The digital domain is just different, with its own drawbacks and advantages.

Yup, and when hosting on flickr, the contrast is raised sharply from the original. There is also added sharpening to the point of distraction.