Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Imagine this

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Santa Barbara
    Posts
    1,376

    Imagine this

    say you had a 8x10 "negative" and you achieved a proper scan with it

    you took down all the settings from the histogram and such


    so now.. if you want to make consistant contact proofs from other negatives.. you first put in that Negative.. then adjust the settings to your standard setting.. then remove that negative and replace it with the one you want to proof

    that way you could tell from that scan how under or over or over developed your negative was and could modify your process

    now imagine if that original standard negative was a 8x10 sheet of acetate with designs printed on it so as to render a good test exposure when used in the above way



    -- just trying to figure out a way to use a scanner to proof negs like one did with an enlarger and proof frame


    did that all make sense?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,084

    Re: Imagine this

    To some extent, yes. Two factors that could spoil the thing are exposure of the negative (obviously) and more importantly non-linearity in the scanner itself. I don't know how bad the latter is though.

  3. #3
    retrogrouchy
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    832

    Re: Imagine this

    Yes, you can calibrate your scanner. Fix the exposure, scan a step-wedge and record all the readings. Scanners are merely high-resolution densitometers.

  4. #4
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,505

    Re: Imagine this

    How
    Tin Can

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Re: Imagine this

    Quote Originally Posted by DrTang View Post
    if you want to make consistant contact proofs from other negatives.. you first put in that Negative.. then adjust the settings to your standard setting.. then remove that negative and replace it with the one you want to proof

    that way you could tell from that scan how under or over or over developed your negative was and could modify your process
    I do this often enough using Epson Scan software, particularly when looking for best development times, film speed tests, etc.

    If you use VueScan you won't be able to do that since it adjusts its scanning parameters automatically, in addition to whatever settings you specify. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

  6. #6
    IanG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Aegean (Turkey & UK)
    Posts
    4,122

    Re: Imagine this

    I'm mostly (over 99%) analog. I don't do contact sheets because I can read a negative better.

    However I can use my Scanner to give me a very accurate idea how my negative will print, that's either using the Epson software or Silverfast. I don't scan very often before I've made wet prints but when I have my wet prints aren't very different to the scans, and vice versa I find it very easy to emulate my wet prints through negative scans and similar tweaking in terms of dodging and burning.

    Ian

Similar Threads

  1. Can you imagine..........
    By ignatiusjk in forum On Photography
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 29-Jan-2008, 03:55
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 4-Dec-2007, 15:48

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •