Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 48

Thread: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

  1. #21
    Richard Johnson
    Guest

    Re: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

    This says more about how lousy National Geographic magazine has become in recent years.

  2. #22
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Neverland Blues again...
    Posts
    6,269

    Re: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jody_S View Post
    My 8x10 is from 1888, and the 11x14 from 1887. I'm pretty sure that goes right past 'old-fashioned' and into 'antique' territory.
    No, you're just decrepit. Welcome to the club, pull up a stool and enjoy...
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Posts
    1,097

    Re: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

    With my wooden Wista, folks often think I'm using an "antique" camera, even though I bought it new in 1989.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Calwell View Post
    With my wooden Wista, folks often think I'm using an "antique" camera, even though I bought it new in 1989.
    Ben, the original Canon 5D which was the first full frame digital camera was announced in August of 2005. Quite often I have seen it advertised as the "Classic" 5D.

    By digital standards your 89 Wista probably is an antique!

  5. #25
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,391

    Re: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

    I got a few camera comments this weekend. It was my annual ritual walk on the Bear Valley Trail over at Pt Reyes - one of the easiest and most popular trails in the entire Bay Area, but people spread out quickly and are always very polite and don't walk in front of the camera without asking first, and the lack of
    wind and crisp winter light are really exceptional there this time of year. The trail attracts a lot of nature-loving types, so everyone seems to have had a DLSR
    rather than a cell phone camera. Some tripods. Most just stared at my pack and couldn't believe that thing was just for the sake of a camera. I packed the 4x5 Norma and smaller Ries this time because of some depth of field issues I've had with the 8x10 previously. One guy simply stated, "beautiful camera!". Well, it is.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Calwell View Post
    With my wooden Wista, folks often think I'm using an "antique" camera, even though I bought it new in 1989.
    Which proves that antique and old fashioned are not necessarily equivalents.

  7. #27
    bob carnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario,
    Posts
    4,944

    Re: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

    Geezz Fred , its only December , just wait til Feb 18thor so everything will piss you off.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fred L View Post
    Am I the only one who is frustrated when large format field cameras are described in articles as 'old fashioned' ?

    A National Geographic piece on favourite cameras used by their photographers describes a metal folding Wista field as such. Is this a fall back catch phrase that they think people will twig onto ? Isn't everything old fashioned ? I could say a Leica MP is old fashioned since it's not far departed from a Leica II (in working principle).

  8. #28
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,391

    Re: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

    I'd say it's NG that's behind the times. Every time they feature some sheet film use, they do something absurdly dated with it, like showing the neg edges all fuzzy,
    ala 70's - trying to look trendy I guess; but it generally comes out corny.

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,249

    Re: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    I'd say it's NG that's behind the times. Every time they feature some sheet film use, they do something absurdly dated with it, like showing the neg edges all fuzzy,
    ala 70's - trying to look trendy I guess; but it generally comes out corny.
    Does anyone still print magazines?
    Wouldn't it be easier to just view them digitally? ..... Nat Geo sounds old fashioned to me.
    Real cameras are measured in inches...
    Not pixels.

    www.photocollective.org

  10. #30

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    north of the 49th
    Posts
    1,425

    Re: 'Old fashioned' cameras ?

    Quote Originally Posted by bob carnie View Post
    Geezz Fred , its only December , just wait til Feb 18thor so everything will piss you off.
    I KNOW !!! by the time we get around to the family stat holiday off in Feb, I'll probably be in full grump mode lol

    tbh, coming from people who watch me use the camera out and about in Toronto or wherever doesn't phase me, they're honestly curious and almost always surprised to hear that these cameras are still being made and that film is not impossible to find. reading it in a NatGeo piece is another thing. one could suggest they're old fashioned being a dead tree publication etc..
    notch codes ? I only use one film...

Similar Threads

  1. Luxurious Cameras vs. Plain Jane Cameras and your Camera of Choice!
    By audioexcels in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 86
    Last Post: 29-Feb-2012, 23:12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •