This says more about how lousy National Geographic magazine has become in recent years.
This says more about how lousy National Geographic magazine has become in recent years.
With my wooden Wista, folks often think I'm using an "antique" camera, even though I bought it new in 1989.
I got a few camera comments this weekend. It was my annual ritual walk on the Bear Valley Trail over at Pt Reyes - one of the easiest and most popular trails in the entire Bay Area, but people spread out quickly and are always very polite and don't walk in front of the camera without asking first, and the lack of
wind and crisp winter light are really exceptional there this time of year. The trail attracts a lot of nature-loving types, so everyone seems to have had a DLSR
rather than a cell phone camera. Some tripods. Most just stared at my pack and couldn't believe that thing was just for the sake of a camera. I packed the 4x5 Norma and smaller Ries this time because of some depth of field issues I've had with the 8x10 previously. One guy simply stated, "beautiful camera!". Well, it is.
I'd say it's NG that's behind the times. Every time they feature some sheet film use, they do something absurdly dated with it, like showing the neg edges all fuzzy,
ala 70's - trying to look trendy I guess; but it generally comes out corny.
I KNOW !!! by the time we get around to the family stat holiday off in Feb, I'll probably be in full grump mode lol
tbh, coming from people who watch me use the camera out and about in Toronto or wherever doesn't phase me, they're honestly curious and almost always surprised to hear that these cameras are still being made and that film is not impossible to find. reading it in a NatGeo piece is another thing. one could suggest they're old fashioned being a dead tree publication etc..
notch codes ? I only use one film...
Bookmarks